(in case not obvious, an homage to this post)

  • MithranArkanere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I like the progress as a science communicator that goes from unnecessarily grandiloquent and verbose to clear and concise.

  • bss03@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    He’s not trying hard enough. You can touch tongues, too. No entwining, but maybe in the P-reversed universe, that’s just taboo.

  • tias@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I don’t understand how this is supposed to be some kind of gotcha or mind blowing realization. Isn’t it obvious to everyone older than 3yo in the entire world?

    • MithranArkanere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Have you wondered why it is that products often have very obvious warnings?
      Not everyone out there is doing stupid things to try and get paid in a lawsuit, some are just that dumb.
      Remember that fad with people wondering why mirrors ‘knew’ what was behind papers?
      Some were just memeing, others were that scientifically illiterate.

  • SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    7 hours ago

    His excuse in interview is that he recycles certain tweets after follower milestones. He’s popular enough that there’s thousands of new followers who won’t have seen his tweets from years ago.

  • Peppycito@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    11 hours ago

    He seems like the kinda guy who spends a lot of time trying to kiss his own ass. This is probably just his disappointment after trying.

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I’ve never really cared for NDT. Every time I’ve heard him talk or be interviewed it sounds like he thinks he’s the most important guy ever.

  • qualia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Rich people don’t run their own social media btw.

    And counter-example: eskimo kisses (w/ eyelashes) checkmate!

  • Rimu@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I’ve noticed a lot of those big-in-microblogging folks have figured out what gives viral among their audience and just keep repeating it over and over in different forms.

    Why? Hooked on the validation? It doesn’t seem healthy.

    • Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I mean, hes a public figure. Having an audience and being publicly seen is kinda good practice from a business standpoint. Of there are easy ways to do that of course public figures are gonna do them 🤷🏻‍♂️

      Does kinda suck though. But I dont think its very surprising.

    • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Its so sad when you return to a tiktok account you haven’t seen since 2020, and its 4 years of doing the same bit once a week.

  • over_clox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I recently got a flexy mirror on a stick, meant to look at difficult to find vehicle parts.

    Thanks for reminding me to inspect and floss my butthole with it too…

        • FosterMolasses@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Only a narcissist thinks the term narcissist is a slur. Lather rinse repeat of “boomer”.

          I wonder how often your behavior causes you to get called that?

        • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 hours ago

          The term narcissist doesn’t just refer to someone with that personality disorder.

          If you are a self-centered asshole, you are a narcissist regardless of an NPD diagnosis.

          See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narcissism

          Narcissism is a self-centered personality style

          Same with calling someone stupid. It doesn’t mean they have a learning disability.

          • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Wikipedia is a tertiary source. Here’s a primary source, which is more reliable:

            https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40107324/

            In terms of labeling, participants repeatedly reported that the word “narcissist” has become synonymous with an insult. This reality can make it difficult for patients to accept their diagnosis.

            We shouldn’t use words in ways that make neurodivergent people feel awful.

            • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              I consider Wikipedia more reliable than vast portions of primary sources. I have seen the awful quality of many papers - “publish or perish” is a thing in science.

              And yes, obviously the label “narcissist” is an insult. Just like calling someone “stupid”. When using it as an insult however, it is clearly meant to say this person displays high amounts of narcissism and behaves like a self-centered asshole.

              This is different to insults such as “autistic” because that is not a personality style but rather a clinical diagnosis. It would be akin to using the term “disabled” as an insult.

              Narcissism is a negative trait if you have too much. That is why it’s an insult. If I say someone is “smelly” I am also insulting their body odor. Doesn’t mean people who struggle with body hygiene for whatever reason should also feel insulted by that.

          • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            That’s not identity first language. That’s identity only language. Identity first language would be “narcissistic person”, which I’m fine with. But identity only language is dehumanising. If you have autism and I call you an autist, or if you have schizophrenia and I call you a sch*zo, does that feel good?

            • Fair distinction on the identity-only bit- I didn’t think that through all the way. However, I do refer to myself as an autist, and I know plenty of autists who feel the same (I make it a habit to ask). Similarly, I refer to myself as bipolar and, naturally, as a narcissist. Hell, even “ADHDer” has become a thing, bc people like nouns. There’s no noun version for bipolar yet, but I’ll be using it if it ever becomes a thing.

              I don’t think it’s dehumanizing; I think it’s empowering, like taking back the word queer. It absolutely does rub me the wrong way though when someone who doesn’t fit the category does it though

        • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          9 hours ago

          You mean the other people have to live with a narcissist. The narcissist isn’t the one suffering.

          • Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            7 hours ago

            I understand the point youre trying to make but if you know anything about the mental health disorder theyre talking about the narcissist is definitely also suffering 😅

            Most personality disorders seem like a special kind of hell to be totally honest.