• TheKracken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Omfg just talk to your kids and fucking be a parent. It’s not that hard. Fucking puritanical shitlords.

  • BrownSugarBits@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The last time I checked, no person under the age of 18 can purchase internet access from an ISP. An adult has to enter a contract before a single byte can be transferred across the internet. All the content you see online was put there by an adult, or the responsibility of an adult. The internet itself is already an age gate.

    This shit is like a nightclub sueing the government to have the bus driver check id’s

  • LilB0kChoy@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    As we’ve said time and time again: the internet will always route around censorship.

    Of course it will. I don’t understand why Utah thinks they can censor content when countries like North Korea and China demonstrate that a circumvention is always found.

      • Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        14 hours ago

        More like *that empowers the surveillance state.

        Honestly, I have nothing against age restricted spaces (within reason). When a bouncer checks your ID at a bar, they historically haven’t been logging that interaction. Its not used to track your movement, reported to your health insurance company, etc…

        If you assigned the death penalty to CEOs who store or sell verification information I could maybe be talked into providing my ID to an online company.

      • plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Everywhere, stuff should have a knowledge or “maturity” test. People age and mature differently, they shouldn’t be limited due to arbitrary distinctions like an age.

        • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Do… I need to point out why this is a dumb statement?

          “She may be 10 but she passed the maturity test!”

          “Yes officer, I’m nine, but I passed the maturity test so it’s fine that I’m smoking and drinking.”

          Age isn’t a great indicator in all respects, but “maturity” is arbitrary and subjective, and makes no damn sense in so, so many instances.

        • WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Problem with that is different people have different ideas as to what’s “mature enough,” or even “mature” at all.

          • tankfox@bookwyr.me
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            13 hours ago

            and since the point is the tracking and not the age at all there’s no reason to even try a maturity test. it’s about your identity, nothing more and nothing less, every single time it’s brought up. If they cared even a shred about kids we’d have universal healthcare so as usual it’s just flat out lies to our face.

        • SailorFuzz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          “You’re very mature for your age”

          • some pedo arguing that age is just a number
  • OwOarchist@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Aylo’s lawsuit does not challenge SB 73’s provision prohibiting the websites covered by the law from sharing information about VPNs.

    Well, somebody should challenge that as well. Seems like a clear-cut 1st amendment violation to me.