I feel like I’m a really good judge of character; I can tell if I’m not going to get along with someone or how they will treat me in the future. When it comes to high profile celebrity figures, i can get a sense of their character through very minimal data. This is why I predict Andrew Tate (toxic manosphere influencer) will pivot into becoming an alien conspiracy influence. But I have no evidence for it, thus the prediction is baseless.

Anyone have any similar beliefs/predictions?

    • FinjaminPoach@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      I’m so sorry to hear that dude, and let’s take a moment to be celebrste the fact you’re still alive - because whether it’s dumb-luck or down to you taking good care of yourself, it’s still worth being joyous about.

      As for being failed by social welfare, you’re in good company because a lot of people on the fediverse are also struggling to thrive in modern “1st world” countries despite being smart and articulate people. Some have the same story as you. I think you will get a lot out of fediverse as a social media, i know i have and i’ve only been here ~ 7 months. It’s heakthy because it’s more like old fashioned forums. (Old fashioned in terms of the internet’s lifespan)

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    I don’t think I am very good at future predictions or expectations. Thirty years ago I never expected what we have now.

    • FinjaminPoach@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 days ago

      Okay now it’s weird how many people are citing things i’ve also thought about!

      I expect him to be a quite significant figure in history textbooks, hopefully as an example of how not to lead, as the USA’s version of King Henry VIII of England, and the reason why the constitution and electoral system was changed. A rare example of president->prison pieline taking place in the USA.

      However. It just feels like he has some unholy power to prolong our suffering and tank any blows to his career or even his life. I fuoly expect that he’ll stay alive as long as possible which wiol prevent americans talking so candidly bout him.

      Or maybe it’ll allow trump to see every last member of his cult turn on him. Maga voters will finally admit that whoever comes after trump is better, they haven’t seen lasting change or security following his regime, and it wasn’t at all worth the humiliation they subjected themselves to. They’re like a really toxic F-ed up college fraternity.

  • DahGangalang@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    10 days ago

    We will see WWIII in my life time (next 50 years, if I’m lucky).

    It will be started over something that will seem incredibly silly, in hindsight.

    • justaman123@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      9 days ago

      I think historians will likely be deciding if we are already in ww3 or not. Although I’m quite surprised China hasn’t moved on Taiwan

        • justaman123@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 days ago

          Yeah, I wonder if China is trying to figure out how to short the markets without the other hedge fund bros figuring out what’s gonna happen. Because the second chip shipments cease is the second this ai circlejerk house of cards musical chairs pass the iou game comes to an end. And then we see the k shaped economy turn into the greatest depression.

    • FinjaminPoach@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 days ago

      I totally agree. If recent Iran conflict war had gone much further or had successfully roped in the USA’s NATO allies, it would have fit all those criterias.

      It shows that we teeter on a precipice above the pit of wartime

      • Aneb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 days ago

        We’ve gotten really comfortable at being 11 seconds to midnight. Anything pushes us past 12am

      • RecursiveParadox@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Spoiler alert from a shipping and oil guy: it ain’t over yet, not by a long shot.

        At least that’s what the people with real money are betting.

      • DahGangalang@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 days ago

        If we’re already in a world war, it should really be called world war 4 or 5. This has the global reach comparable to Vietnam or the Russia/Afghanistan conflict.

  • OriginEnergySux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    With so many AI data centres needing so much power and none seeming to use solar power etc, we’ll start seeing “grid rationing” where suburbs will get “time zones” where there will be power and no power.

    Instead of people rising up or pushing back, they will get distracted by arguing that certain/richer suburbs get prioitised more than lower class suburbs.

  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    10 days ago

    Not completely baseless, but Florida is going to go bankrupt one year and cause a major political problem for the US.

    • kobra@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      How does Disney factor into this prediction? I’ve never been there, but it seems like an oasis in the middle of a shit desert (speaking mostly about its ability to manage itself and just generally function).

      • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 days ago

        It doesn’t help that DeSantis’s anti-Disney push was around the time that Disney was in the process of moving more corporate jobs from California to Florida, which Disney stopped doing after the fiasco.

        However, what will likely cause a collapse is that Florida has gotten into hurricane home insurance. If there is a bad year for Florida, Florida might not be able to cover the payouts for insurance claims. Combined with its current housing price slump already, and Florida may have major issues down the road.

        • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 days ago

          i heard people are paying double/triple the premiums for home insurance. plus all the snowbirds/retirement folks going there are rethinking thier plans.

          • DahGangalang@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 days ago

            I know someone in Florida who pays about 40% more than me in home owners insurance, despite my mid-Atlantic house being worth ~2.5x as much.

            • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              a lot of people that retire there tend to be rich people, canadians too. and they likely arnt buying the ones close to the coast?

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 days ago

        disney, and HOME insurance is one of the things besides disney keeping it afloat. nobody wants to risk insuring a disaster prone state.

    • No_Ones_Slick_Like_Gaston@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      If they move on with removing taxes on property the political and operational shot show of cities and counties without cash turning to special assessments and creating fees for school police and public services, essentially taxes that can raise without being voted, and with less supervision, that will make the “no step on snake” crowd revolt because gvmnt services without payment seems to be their thing.

  • snoons@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    9 days ago

    I think there will be some crazy scientific breakthrough that will change everything.

    Totally baseless, and it’s mostly the idiot optimist inside me that believes it, but I kind of have to believe it else I’ll go bananaser then I already am.

    • FinjaminPoach@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      AI has honestly changed a lot about my life/intended life plan. Especially when it was released, it basically rolled out as i graduated high school.

      I actually started out in a creative/arts based degree but quit it early on, so i think to a lot of people it looked like i was scared of AI stealing my job. I wasn’t back then, but i now kind of am concerned that scummy employers will lay-off a lot of people and try to have AI do their work in that field.

      Anyway not to say AI fits your description, as it doesn’t really, but it indicates to me that sense of tumultuous change. Likewise, covid. That changed everything too. I don’t think these things come in pairs but in waves, kike the chsnge of the 19th and 20th centuries.

      • snoons@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 days ago

        To me, AI is most impactful in ways it was originally created for: combing through large data sets to make connections, even if that data set is a picture, or fifty of them. E.g., an ai was used to look at pictures taken with a microscope and it was able to pick out different structures/organisms without staining. Similar systems were also used to find discrete hints of far off galaxies than astronomers would struggle to detect without making their data quite noisy.

        The big companies had nothing to do with these afaik, especially since the researchers that wrote the papers used machine learning in there methodology instead of the colloquial “AI”, which I will always see as a misnomer until such time an AI is generally accepted to be someone, which I don’t believe will happen anytime soon with our level of technology and failing biosphere.

    • BJW@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      And I think it will come from AI. It’s either that or aliens, and only one of those two actually exist.

      • snoons@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 days ago

        Eh, maybe AI adjacent, and certainly not from the big ai companies.

  • tensorpudding@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    Geoengineering to combat climate change by mass carbon capture will be the solution that saves humanity but will arrive too late to prevent some harrowing effects.

    Self-driving vehicles will become good enough to technically be safer for passengers than human drivers soon, but the stigma around them will continue for a long time after they are road legal and their uptake will be very slow.

    • Bilbo Baggins@hobbit.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 days ago

      Any idea if mass carbon capture could undo runaway venus-like greenhouse effects? I have no hope that humanity will put up with even minor inconveniences until lead starts melting at room temperature at the equator. It would give me hope if there was a way to undo runaway greenhouse processes.

      • Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 days ago

        It seems kind of unlikely. It could be part of an array of solutions. Right now it captures something like 0.1%. That means it would take 1000 times the current infrastructure to support it, including carbon-neutral energy to cover the additional energy costs. All that is assuming 100% carbon capture is even viable. Even then, that doesn’t solve the problem of the carbon that’s already in the environment, which will continue to warm the earth for centuries.

        There’s an interesting emergency option: Stratospheric aerosol injection.

        If we got to the point where the runaway effect was unavoidable, it might be possible to use this before civilization starts to collapse. It would probably have a lot of nasty side effects, but it might be able to buy enough time for CO2 levels to come back down. At least civilization could survive in some form.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      countries dont seem interested in combatting climate change at all. plus there is one country that solely funds anti-climate change as thier economy depends on it, combined with the rest of the oil-gas industry. trying to get funding for research about climate change is a little dicey too.

    • FinjaminPoach@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      that saves humanity but will arrive too late to prevent some harrowing effects.

      One harrowing thing i expect is for there to be mass migration attributed to climate change - after all, we already see mass migration for smaller reasons, so even if they don’t strictly speaking need to move north (or south), i think new media and scientists will just attribute any migration that occurs as being climate-influenced driven.

      Arguably a good thing, if it raises peoples’ concerns for climate change. I think this is why a lot of RWers dismiss climate change as a hoax though, because of its connection to mass exodus from the “globsl south”. Two things can be true.

      I expect we will lose some entire settlements, coastal ones. I think Egypt will get messed uo because of their weird relationship with water, and major cities with major sea defence projects are ones to look out for - they’re ramping up sea defences in New York right now, making me think something is coming (next 20 years or so)

    • Sailor Anarres@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 days ago

      Couldn’t disagree more with either of those takes. Self driving cars won’t be safer even theoretically given unsolvable problems and will almost certainly lead to even worse pedestrian rights and make our cities so much worse. That solution to climate change isn’t realistic of feasible at all we need if we are going to solve it massive systematic change and an end to capitalism.

      • tensorpudding@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        What are the unsolvable problems with autonomous cars? Also I agree it is a bad thing for pedestrian rights and cities in general.

        • applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 days ago

          the decision making problem is the obvious one. there are an infinite number of possible edge cases to deal with when it comes to driving a car on roads with humans. current strategies require a bespoke solution to pretty much all of them, meaning tons of common edge cases arent covered and the vehicles will take potentially wildly inappropriate actions in unhandled cases, without even considering false positive or false negative detection of handled edge cases. this problem will never go away, and if you could make a computer that could do it as reliably as a human it would basically be agi. its a sisyphian problem that isnt going to be solved before we remember how great trains and streets without cars are.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    9 days ago

    The AI bubble will burst sometime in 2027/early 2028.

    Trump will use the financial collapse as an excuse to suspend elections.

    The majority will be too busy scrambling to survive to complain.

    • FinjaminPoach@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      Same to first statement, i actually forgot trump would be around by 27 and 28 (because i’m not american), and that theory all lines up

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      he needs to keep the epstein files from being discussed, Dems dont seem to keen on trying to release it, they are just stringing it along, despite them "claiming they will do it.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      argentina, most of them will likely flee there, not russia, since putin will likely find a window for you and steal your assets down the line.

    • FinjaminPoach@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      Seems very plausible.

      As a kid i always wondered why countries didn’t buy up parts of other countries to avoid bloodshed for territory.

      I still figure it could work really well for wealthy governments like Switzerland but i now realise that:

      A) A country’s proper area is very important to it, especially an “ancient” country like Switzerland’s neighbours,

      B) Citizens do cause a fuss about having their leaders change undemocratically or suddenly - it could make taxes or travel different - and they tend to revolt at sudden unconsented change like that, even if it’s only surface level.

      I see this being most likely to occur for places like middle eastern oil states, so Oligarchs is definitely the right conditionality. Or big empires like the USA and China

      • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        One stratagem is to buy up the territory and then be mindful of the needs of those who are already on it.

        The problem is, when we’re rich and powerful, it’s just way to easy to indulge our racist and classist proclivities, and then do a genocide.

        Seriously, we humans just haven’t evolved past the bush tribes we were fifty thousand years ago.

        • FinjaminPoach@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          Yes, true. Could have been known as the great merchant empire, but it’s overshadowed by their attempts and successes at military conquest and coup d’etats instead.

  • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Have you seen Elysium?

    Yeah…pretty much that. In some form or another. It won’t necessarily be the wealthy people blasting off to a space station, more likely just hiding away on luxury islands while the rest of the world continues to go to shit.

  • lonefighter@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 days ago

    I think the earth is going to metaphorically say enough is enough and step in to fix climate change because humans are too selfish and greedy to do it ourselves. I think this is going to come by way of a massive volcanic eruption that causes short term global cooling while killing a good chunk of the population across a large geographical area both from the immediate disaster and the resulting long term damage from widespread ash/famine that could result.

    • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      The earth has been through many many climate changes, this isn’t the first, it isn’t the last

      The earth don’t care, it keeps chugging along, no it’s us that won’t survive

  • FinjaminPoach@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Some other ones:

    • I think North Korea will be accepted back into the fold of the international community - this could occur through any of these 3 mechanisms: 1) “rehabilitated” to be more like other nations, 2) eventually proves its system to be successful, or 3) simply the US gives up on its shunning of the country. All evidence and past performance shows that it won’t, but i still expect it to happen some time before 2075.
    • I don’t think sentient aliens exist. Okay so there’s the goldilocks nature of Earth’s position which evidences in favour of my stance, but even without that, i just feel like we’re alone
    • bonus showerthought: imagine if aliens in the future try to “cancel” humanity for basically committing intergalactic blackface by making things like Star Wars and Star Trek. That’s my baseless prediction if aliens exist
    • I think the star wars sequel trilogy will be retconned out of canon
    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 days ago

      Regarding North Korea, it seems like it is a national decision instead of an international decision. There have been cases where trade was allowed to occur with North Korea and it was North Korea which chose to close the program.

      Even now, North Korea could theoretically force a more open travel system with Russia and North Korea chooses not to. Hell, North Korea probably could get a peace treaty out of Trump and chooses not to.

    • BurgerBaron@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      I really doubt we’re the only sentient life but we’ll never meet any is my bet. The observable universe is mind bogglingly huge. The unobservable is so much bigger. So many stars, so many planets.

    • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      I have also had the thought that aliens might be offended by all the media humans have made about aliens

      • FinjaminPoach@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        7-9, i call 1-3 the Prequels. I think in a way retconning 7-9 is the most profitable thing disney can do with it, there have been a few silly rumours they might do it too.

        • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          They could also remake the prequels and get some real writers on them and make them good.

          Looking at Disney’s MCU ouvre, it’s a blend of hits and misses, so I don’t fully trust the company to not mess it up.

          • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 days ago

            DIsney ruined the MCU with streaming, they were just producing slop post-endgame. apparently they are being fickle with DOCTOR who as well form BBC.

          • FinjaminPoach@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 days ago

            I’m in favour of leaving the prequels as they are, but it wouldn’t upset me if they remade any of the movies. As long as it’s an actual remake and not minute cgi changes or dumping CGI assets into the OT films (they did this).

            Like, Disney could have and probably should have just done animated versions of the original trilogy, seeing as they chose to rehash the general shell of the story and pass it off as a sequel trilogy. I would not have cared if they did that - i would have avoided watching just to save money but i think that would be the logical first step for disney, childrens’ animation producer, to do with Star Wars, beloved franchise, and it would have helped to draw in a new generation of fans.

            If they’d even rehashed the story a bit, e.g “fixed the prequels,” added more female protags in the OT, made it more sparkly and disney-esque, then that’s fine. Loads of Sci-Fi franchises have had reboots like that, and fans are capable of seperating original from new wave interpretation (Stargate and I think Star Trek are some examples of this.)