• zen@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    6 days ago

    If I won’t own them, I’m not buying them. This is them shooting themselves in the feet.

  • Clutter@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    7 days ago

    Even if they succeed with a weird judge to prove this… It’s not the point. We want to own stuff, so either make “owning” available or we stop buying/renting.

    • ikirin@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      7 days ago

      Also, there is the common online sentiment “If buying isn’t owning, then piracy is not stealing” and I can’t help but believe that this will permiate even deeper into the gaming culture.

      • ranzispa@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Piracy has never been stealing, whether you were allowed to own the thing or not. Piracy is a copyright infringement.

  • xelar@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Its crazy how everybody got used to rental prices as high as physical copy.

  • Destide@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 days ago

    I can prove in home that I don’t own any playstation past the 4.

    Let’s see who loses.

  • tigermountain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 days ago

    “Sony pushes the idea that “reasonable consumers would not be misled” into believing they own the games in their digital library”.

    Wasn’t this the same basic legal outcome Fox News received when they were sued and it was determined that ‘no reasonable viewer’ would think Tucker Carlson was anything but entertainment? That worked out well.

    • zerofk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      But people who are easily fooled by such things are exactly the ones who need extra protection. Many laws exist to protect the weaker members of society.

    • Kurtismayfield@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      The courts still need to weigh in on this. If you purchase a license to use the software, the company shouldn’t have the power to revoke that license without cause. The license should last as long as the copyright/patent/etc. does.

      • HerbGrower@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        There may well be a valid argument that they don’t make it clear enough at the point of sale too.

    • EatMyPixelDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      They are wrong, you can buy digital downloads from other platforms like GOG, Itch.io, Humble Store, and keep the files forever. There is no DRM on those purchases, no way for the seller to revoke it in any way. Sony could operate their store that way too but choose not to.

  • lemmelemmy@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    To prove their decision to ban physical was greedy? Are they trying to shoot them on the foot or just a rage bait title?

  • 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    im just glad i didn’t invest in a console or a gaming PC because game streaming is going to be the norm very soon.

      • Atropos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I’ve still got an OnLive console in my closet gathering dust! Bring on the streaming revolution!

        I should clean out my closet.

    • treesquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Hah, no it isn’t. They want it to be, but it’ll only be clueless poors that use it, and then the price will creep up super quickly and it’ll be full of ads and everything is a subscription and your favorite games will just randomly disappear and you won’t be able to do a damn thing about it and suddenly you’ll go “shit, I should have just bought a computer.”

      If you trust streaming gaming to be handled responsibly then you should really ask yourself why these companies want so badly for you to not only not own your games but also not even own your hardware, and why you even entertain the notion that the companies offering it will behave any better when they have total control over your entire gaming ecosystem.

      • 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        who said anything about responsibly? its going to be convenient like video streaming and that’s case closed