Title says it. I have 20,000 in my head, but I don’t know where I got that from.

  • 𞋴𝛂𝛋𝛆@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    When I have seen the numbers, it always surprised me how varied the patterns are in reality. We tend to think in tribalistic terms. Like all other users follow a similar pattern as self, but that tends to be very wrong. The majority of users are usually not the daily routine type but the once or twice a week, and once or twice a month types.

    Intuitively, if you notice the way post responses tend to be somewhat random and unpredictable in terms of voting and replies, this viewership pattern covers that probability. Watch places like reddit in the good times of the past when a repost is made at a time of day that should encompass a fresh audience. The initial momentum from vote responses is often very different. It results in entirely different trajectories overall. Could be other factors there. I have seen similar here, but at much smaller differentials.

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      22 days ago

      The active chart would be really useful if it showed both active posting and active logged in (reading). I can’t find anywhere in the websites or the github what “active” means, and while I would guess it means by posts, maybe that’s optimistic since any platform anywhere can have accounts that are “dead”.

    • Pika@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      It’s got to be based off of comments and posts because if you look at Lemmy.world, despite the fact that they’re getting roughly 2k new users a month, they’re still decreasing in active users. If it was based off of users logged in, then it should always be at bare minimum the number of new accounts for that month. image of lemmy.world stats showing increase in accounts but decrease in actives