I think that’s an iffy area, because whats the differentiation between “The image I found was already like that” and someone intentionally removing it.
Unless they admitted to it like some have, I don’t see that as easily enforceable.
Yeah, but personally I would do it on a “good faith” system. If someone accidentally put a cropped comic, and someone calls them out, if they edit it back it’s fine. But if they repeatedly post cropped comics, they get banned
I agree a good faith system would be best, I think it would be a good idea to ban or delete posts where they have admitted that they cropped it but, I think forcing a must have source or repeated no source type rule isn’t going to be a good route. It will disincentivize people from wanting to post in the first place if they don’t already have a source on the post. Some may prefer that but, honestly on an already low userbase platform, I don’t think that’s a good thing.
This is more of a matter of not removing artist credits that were there. If it never existed then it’s fine.
I think that’s an iffy area, because whats the differentiation between “The image I found was already like that” and someone intentionally removing it.
Unless they admitted to it like some have, I don’t see that as easily enforceable.
Yeah, but personally I would do it on a “good faith” system. If someone accidentally put a cropped comic, and someone calls them out, if they edit it back it’s fine. But if they repeatedly post cropped comics, they get banned
I agree a good faith system would be best, I think it would be a good idea to ban or delete posts where they have admitted that they cropped it but, I think forcing a must have source or repeated no source type rule isn’t going to be a good route. It will disincentivize people from wanting to post in the first place if they don’t already have a source on the post. Some may prefer that but, honestly on an already low userbase platform, I don’t think that’s a good thing.