You must log in or # to comment.
Wow. Such shitpost. Much funny.
Of course it is false. It was said by a Republican politician.
When will anyone ever consider suing these pieces of shits?
Suing for defamation is very hard in US. It is only practical against poor people in states without anti SLAP laws. I don’t think a republican politician would have problems with financing his defense for not at all corrupt reasons /s
Right, but costing them money while having it on the record that they lied is something. If you have the time and money yourself
When they can’t remember which brown person said what
I thought it was American Evangelicals that thought sinful liberals deserved it.
Wasn’t it gay people, as always, who brought down the wrath of God?
or anti imperialists
What we learn here is that Mike Rogers thinks America may have deserved the 9/11 attacks. It’s an open, debatable question in his mind.
He didn’t say, but he would have been correct if he did
Thousands of people died. But who gives a shit about them, right?
The people didn’t deserve that, but incredible violence been done in the name of the country, so it’s inevitable that someone would strike back.
But it was honestly a gift to the warhawks in that country. They immediately used the political capital to attack a convenient and unrelated middle eastern country.
Yup. That is exactly what violent expressions of hatred results in.
So what lesson did you learn from the end result of using violence out of hatred towards a country?
That we can feel superior to all parties by pointing out the obvious?
Saying people deserve to be the target of violence isn’t being superior to anyone.
deleted by creator
People live in countries. People die when countries have wars.
You have to be a real psychopath to forget that countries are made up of people.
Yes, violence is bad.
They did. They didn’t deserve it. USA, however, armed, trained and killed people who commited that attack, and did nothing to prevent this kind of retailation. If you kill someone’s family, hand them a loaded gun and turn around, you deserve to get shot.
Not that “deserve” is the best word to explain blowback, but I’m sure you can bridge this gap in semantics, and understand that victims aren’t the people blamed in that context.
Yeah, you can’t explain it because it’s obvious. Only a psychopath thinks it’s fine to kill some office workers and fire fighters out of some fucked up perversion of “justice” because some other group of people getting killed by some other psychopaths at some other time.
Your way of thinking isn’t any different from the people you hate.
USA as entity deserves hate of the world, and hate radicalizes people into becoming “psychopaths”. Acknowledging the fact that USA created opportunity for 9/11 to happen doesn’t mean it was good that it did. Even now, when USA is waging this senseless war with Iran and people see their families murdered for no other reason than Trump wanting to steal some money, that is creating more people so full of hatred and frustration, that they will see violence against anyone they associate with their enemy as justified. I’m not (and neither is anyone speaking of blowback) saying that the cycle of violence is good or justified, but recognizing that USA starting it and continuing to escalate it LEADS to the potential blowback is necessary. Furthermore, nobody is saying that Al-Quaida or Osama bin Laden bere justified in planning and executing 9/11. And I’ll even go as far as to say that they might have done that sooner or later regardless of USA murder spree in middle east, though it would be completely different timeline and very unlikely. They didn’t do that in vacuum, however. They had all the reasons (and don’t forget about training and weapons they received from USA) to hate, to be radicalized the way they were, to go crazy from the suffering that was inflicted on them. Do you understand now? Nobody is saying that 9/11 was good, or that Al-Quaida was good, or that the victims deserved to die. America deserved a blowback for what it did in middle east. It created support for those ideas in the minds of people who lost everything because of USA. The more hatred it caused, the more likely a blowback became. Only reason I say “deserve” is not the perfect word to explain it, is because the way it is usually used suggests some sort of justice being served, invokes emotions of satisfaction with someone bad getting punished and so forth. However, you claiming that “america deserved 9/11” means the same thing as “people who died in 9/11 deserved it” is just sophistry on your side. You know they aren’t the same statement. And if you didn’t, well, now you do. Stop being obstinate.
That’s a lot of text to just rationalize why it’s fine for you to be the same as the people you hate. You’re just white washing your hatred with a very thin veneer of something to do with nation states which is exactly the same thing the US does when it bombs countries.
You’re no different from the people you hate. You should be judged in exactly the same way you’re judging others.
Who are the people you claim I hate, and what judgement have I bestowed on anyone? You’re barely making any sense with your responses. And I’m pretty sure you’re not reading mine.
USA as entity deserves hate of the world
The very first thing you said. Do you normally act surprised when people say you’re hateful when you furiously type out some long text (without paragraph breaks) about why a whole country deserves to be hated in an effort to rationalize violence against citizens of that country?
They are saying that the actual victims, the folks in the towers, did not deserve to die. Everyone agrees that the attacks on 9/11 were horrendous. But the US had engaged in activities where this was the inevitable outcome. America as an entity deserved the attacks because of decades of wars, conflict, and instability it caused in the middle east, often leading to similar if not greater acts of violence in those countries. This isn’t a fucked up sense of justice, but an acknowledgement that at some point the roosters were going to come home to roost.
Shut up yank
Except not really, because in context he was talking about the boomerang effect. But if authoritarians and liberals understood nuance they wouldn’t be authoritarians or liberals.
Hey they both have scary terrorist names… Easy mistake to make /s
Like the terrorist sounding police officer who got killed
Dealbreaker
