Sir. Haxalot@nord.pub to Comic Strips@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 days agoTavern’s Closedcdn.nord.pubimagemessage-square65linkfedilinkarrow-up1656arrow-down126file-text
arrow-up1630arrow-down1imageTavern’s Closedcdn.nord.pubSir. Haxalot@nord.pub to Comic Strips@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 days agomessage-square65linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 days agoI’m not sure what you’re saying. No matter what liquid the church uses, transubstantiation turns it into jesus’s blood. Right? When I have had jesus’s blood, it had alcohol in it. So anytime the church does transubstantiation, regardless of liquid it started with, it ends up alcoholic.
minus-squareZoot@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 days agoA sample size of 1 is no study at all for your hypothesis.
minus-squareZoot@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 days agoFor instance, any time I had jesus’s blood when I was a catholic, it was always a nice grape flavor.
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·4 days agoSo yours didn’t have alcohol? Maybe my priest was a fraud. Or maybe yours? How can we test?
I’m not sure what you’re saying. No matter what liquid the church uses, transubstantiation turns it into jesus’s blood. Right?
When I have had jesus’s blood, it had alcohol in it.
So anytime the church does transubstantiation, regardless of liquid it started with, it ends up alcoholic.
A sample size of 1 is no study at all for your hypothesis.
For instance, any time I had jesus’s blood when I was a catholic, it was always a nice grape flavor.
So yours didn’t have alcohol?
Maybe my priest was a fraud. Or maybe yours? How can we test?