In your humble opinion, are the majority of the homeless people responsible for the situation they are in? IOW: do they deserve to be homeless, because it is their personal failure or do they not, because they are a victim of the circumstances (the reasons they are where they are are largely out of their control)? Have you ever talked to homeless people? Are they really just “bad people” and “will never change” or are they hardworking individuals who’ve just had a punch by life that they were unable to stand after?

  • marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Answering in good faith as someone recovering from homelessness, knowing this post is so severely downvoted and will probably be removed or ignored.

    In your humble opinion, are the majority of the homeless people responsible for the situation they are in?

    No.

    For this and the rest of your questions there are 5 main types of ‘homeless’ and all categories below often find themselves into multiple of these categories the longer they are homeless.

    Archetype 1, The Victim: Nearly all homeless technically fall into this category, but I’m going to define this as you did, ‘victim of circumstances outside of their control.’ All homeless start out like this. Either from being born mentally ill and no longer having care, losing a job, losing a house, running away from abusive parents, running away from other domestic violence, being a part of the foster care system, or getting addicted to drugs (most commonly through the opioid epidemic.) But to further clarify and deal with annoying people:

    Archetype 2, The Mentally ill: American society specifically is not built to handle those that cannot help themselves. It is so violently against the chronically ill and mentally ill, that the majority of those suffering from severe illness of any type will end up homeless at some point during their lives (including ‘couch surfing’ as homeless). Most homeless people will eventually become mentally ill if they stay on the streets longer than six months. Given the lack of available reasonable resources to get out of homelessness, this is a large minority of The Victims.

    Archetype 3, The Druggie: Drug addiction is a disease, a disease you are either genetically predisposed to, or not. It can start as a choice, but does not always start as a choice. Stopping is not a choice most can physically make. This, like all addictions, will only end when it is ended. Barring arguably divine intervention only hitting rock bottom and staying there can truly ‘cure’ someone of drug addiction. So once they reach the end of their grace with their loved ones and friends, they’re still alive, but cannot maintain enough free floating cash to maintain a home (if they could even qualify)

    Archetype 4, The Victim, but old: In many parts of the country you cannot get a job past a certain age, you will be discriminated against. And it will be done automatically in a plausibly deniable way. This gap usually exists between 55 and 62. This is the age you are most like to become homeless for the first time as of 2020. You get laid off, you get fired, you get constructively let go, you don’t have social security, you don’t have a good enough body for general labor, you will be discriminated against severely by pretty much everyone hiring… and then you end up homeless. And until you get your social security, you will stay homeless, as older people (before social security age) are usually at the bottom of the list for grants (specifically older white men have the least available options and programs to help them out of homelessness).

    Archetype 5, (Rare) (Epic) (Legendary) The Actually Prefers Homeless: Easily the 0.001% of homeless people. These are never the ones you have ever seen on a broadcast or news report, except when they rarely get caught. They don’t and won’t ever fully fit into society, as they fundamentally reject the concept. Everyone else can and has been cured before, this is the only archetype that ‘deserves’ to be homeless, because it is genuinely the only thing they want in life.

  • SlayersFan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I’ll say something stupid here, are drunk driving accidents just because the guy was slightly drunk or because he wasn’t skilled enough at driving? I’d bet an f1 driver could survive driving on a regular neighborhood off skill alone, while a regular person could prob crash and burn. I think being homeless is the same as drinking alcohol while driving, the alcohol being the social difficulties/outside circumstances and then your personal skill in managing life/jobs. I think it’s both, but after you become homeless for a while, its harder to get back on track so you can spiral down and then it’s harder.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    sometimes yes, mostly no.

    homelessness isn’t so black and white cut and dry. its causes are as numerous as the victims that exist.

    nobody deserves to be homeless.

    the worst thing about the homeless is that you’re always one bad day away from joining them.

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    When we did a homelessness study in our community we found out most homeless were not actually homeless. Many had a place to go but because of mental illness, addiction, and other circumstance could not go there.

    We butted heads quite a bit with the business leaders and learned they got what they wanted regardless of community wishes. All of our seating was removed from our small town to prevent homeless from sleeping on benches. No one in the community wanted this except the businesses leaders.

    Every time we would come up with a good plan it would be shot down. It became quickly apparent that the business leaders didn’t want to solve the problem. They just wanted to hide it.

    In my humble opinion asking the question you have shows a high level of ignorance and callousness. This is because you are ignorant to the plight of homeless people and how this is connected to our society at large. Simply put, the homeless serve as a brutal reminder of what will happen to us if we don’t participate in our system the way the wealthy want us to.

  • bonsai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I’ve been spit on, stalked, threatened, harassed by homeless people. More of my interactions with the homeless have been overall negative than positive.

    And you know what? I still don’t fault them or think they deserve what they’re going through. I think everyone deserves a roof over their head and food in their bellies. Full stop. No ifs, ands, or buts.

    The homeless are not “bad people” or lazy. They are people that are down on hard times and our society as a whole has failed them because they don’t live up to arbitrary expectations.

  • Necrifyre@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    The picture does not need to be that big and it has no purpose at all for the topic at hand. Also, you are handling criticism very poorly.

    I don’t feel very compelled to engage in this.

    • qvi8dhqln@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      What is there to handle? One called me a bot, the other one didn’t like what I had to say and got mad about it

        • qvi8dhqln@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Dude, maybe I wouldnt have to resort to them if the dude didnt side with 2 other assholes who baselessly accused me?

          • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            And all of those down votes show how great of a job you’re doing at proving them wrong. Keep it up!

                • qvi8dhqln@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  Nah, buddy, unlike an imbecile I can actually back that up and despite sounding harsh and you not liking it it still will make sense. You see, people here seem to not like my tone (iow, they respond to the form of the words as opposed to their meaning). Even though I make complete sense by responding that way to accusatory statements

          • Necrifyre@piefed.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            9 hours ago

            You’re being confrontational, you’re slinging insults unprovoked, you’ve responded to criticism harshly over the image you’ve used that has nothing to do with the topic. You know these things, but look at the way you’re behaving about it.

            It’s obvious to me that you’re probably not that new here if your first instinct is to be that antagonizing. Which tells me that it probably lead to multiple bannings in whatever and however many accounts you’ve made before.

            Doesn’t matter who started what. It’s evident that you’re hurting yourself more in this than I am.

            • qvi8dhqln@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Being confrontational isnt a bad thing on its own tho. R u suggesting I just calmly take it being called a bot and the other guy calling me a troll? Thats accusations and I respond to them accordingly. You throw shit at someone, dont cry about shit being thrown at you back

              • Necrifyre@piefed.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 hours ago

                Yes it is because you’re basically asking to be banned or posts removed. Your stances do not matter in the way the rules are instilled here. You break them, you’re done for. You are given tools to block the people you feel are bothering you, you’ve no excuses.

                All that you’re asking for again is just getting disciplined by a system that does not care about your beliefs. You’re not winning anything and the people you think are wrong are getting the last laugh as you’re treated as the problem you’re being reported as.

                So again, get a grip on your maturity.

                • qvi8dhqln@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  If the rules are that unflexible then I am content with being banned for breaking them, they are stupid anyway and I dont agree to them. I still didn’t do anything wrong

                • qvi8dhqln@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  Ah, dont care enough about not being banned to not call them out on their bs, soooo, still a win, I am not the silent taker type

  • Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    11 hours ago

    It doesn’t matter how they got there, the fact that our society doesn’t stop their fall to that point and provide help but spends enormous amounts of money and resources elsewhere is telling.

  • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I only ever go to know the situation of one homeless person closer. It was in Poland, about 25 years ago… I was told that this guy went from orphanage straight to the military and when he go out, after years of living under very strict rules he simply wasn’t able to/didn’t wan to follow any orders anymore. When some people helped him find a job he didn’t show up the first day there was a good weather because he preferred to go for a walk. So not a bad person but also not a hardworking person. Simply someone that went trough a bad system and wasn’t prepared to function in a society. Every case is different.

  • NoxAstrum@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Are they completely free of responsibility? Of course not. Did they wake up one day and say “I’m going to become homeless, see what all the fuss is about.”? Of course not.

    I’m going to assume that nearly every person who’s homeless has some external factors like genetics (addiction, mental health etc), and some poor choices that led them to that situation. It’s very likely that a lot of the poor choices have their root in the mental health problems.

    It’s exceptionally difficult to succeed in this world when you don’t have the tools to navigate it. A bad day for you might be permanently devastating for someone else.

    I guarantee they have some disadvantage other people don’t.

      • qvi8dhqln@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        10 hours ago

        If I was I would peobably pick something that looks like Im not a troll, I wouldnt be that obvious. Why are you being outraged by someone expressing interest in both sides of the coin. I get it, you pity homeless and think they deserve compassion and help. But I am trying to understand the reasoning of the people who are on the other side of the fence

          • qvi8dhqln@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Whats your deal? Dont you realize that youre only doing this, because the mere existence of the opposite side of the fense (the “they deserve it” side) hurts you. Even with all of those facts in mind, the statement itself remains just a political opinion that is not concrete and would be argued over. And guess what, I am not on either side, I am sitting on the fense, observing who can give me better reasoning to back their position up

            • one_old_coder@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 hours ago

              I am sitting on the fense, observing who can give me better reasoning

              I get it, you pity homeless and think they deserve compassion and help

              You don’t care, please stop. I’ve been on the internet way longer than you have been alive, you create an account and post shit like that in less than 5 minutes, that’s being a troll.

              • qvi8dhqln@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                10 hours ago

                About helping homeless? Yeah, but I jever said I did, my emotionally charged thinker bro. I am just trying to clash 2 opposite opinions under 1 post and see if I can reach some conclusion, but so far Ive seen only thr left-leaning one and not much fro people of the opposite one

                • unmagical@lemmy.ml
                  cake
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  That’s … that’s a weird thing to do. Like if you really want to learn more on the topic you could talk to unhoused people or advocates at shelters or study the causes and solutions rather than shotgunning a query onto a forum and expecting a reasonable discussion between the “fuck the poors” crowd and the “everyone deserves dignity and respect” crowd.

                  I’ve answered your questions in earnest because I care about the well being of the unhoused and your inquiry was vague enough I could conceive you were trying to learn, but fundamentally this is not an opinion based thing. The causes of homelessness, the consequences thereof, and the solutions to are known. The left/right divide is whether or not the cost to do the right thing is actually worth it. Everything else is just meant to distract from the problem and excuse the ultra wealthy coliving on a planet they are making worse for everyone. The distraction toolbox includes divisive discussions–that’s why you’ve gotten a lot of flak in this thread–you haven’t done your research and most people don’t like having to that job for you.

  • basiclemmon98@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 hours ago

    if you care how they got there, you’re the problem.

    Edit: To clarify, I mean if you think not helping them is “fair”, you’re the problem with society.

  • Melllvar@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 hours ago

    They are responsible for their situation and they are victims of circumstance. These are not mutually exclusive.

  • YoFrodo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    No, statistically most of them suffer from psychological issues and society has failed to support them. We have enough wealth and resources to support everyone, the fact that we do not is a choice society has made to prioritize the concentration of wealth and let others suffer and starve.

    76.2% of homeless individuals in high-income countries have at least one current mental disorder (per mhstats.org)

    • Over three-quarters of people experiencing homelessness in high-income countries have a current mental disorder, a rate significantly higher than the general population. 76.2%
    • Serious Mental Illness (SMI) affects approximately 22% of homeless adults, a rate nearly four times that of the general population.
    • Substance use disorders are exceptionally common, with alcohol use disorders affecting 36.7% of the homeless population—a rate nearly 10 times higher than housed individuals.
    • Access to care is severely limited; only 30% of homeless adults with a severe mental illness receive adequate mental healthcare, and up to 60% struggle with medication adherence.
    • Homeless youth are a particularly vulnerable group, with nearly 40% identifying as LGBTQ+ and suicide attempt rates reaching as high as 33% for those who have also run away.
    • The ‘Housing First’ model proves highly effective, with over 90% of participants remaining stably housed by prioritizing permanent housing with integrated, voluntary support services. >90%
      • unmagical@lemmy.ml
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Housing first means to provide housing as the first step to ending homelessness. No means testing: if you need a home you get a home. Shelter is imperative for survival and housing is the best type of shelter. Once housed, everthing else becomes easier. Rehab is easier. Getting a job is easier. Staying healthy is easier. Avoiding violent crime is easier. Because it has so many positive knock on effects–more than any other approach–it should be the first step to reintegrating in society. It’s important to note, however, that it puts housing first and not only. Other wraparound services are still required to lift people out of poverty. For instance, it makes rehab easier, but if there’s no rehab options nearby healing from a drug addiction is harder than it needs to be.

        Ideally it would be housing for all and society wouldn’t let people fall to the point of living in the streets, but we failed that and so housing first is what is needed to get back on track.

        Housing first does not mean everyone gets a free single family home, it means everyone has access to reasonable shelter and privacy. That could be served by hotels, retro fitting empty office complexes, or tiny homes. Something enough for people to be safe and dignified.

        And hey, like UBI, whenever it’s been tried it works.

      • missingno@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 hours ago

        It means step one is to provide housing, no questions asked, without it being contingent on drug or mental health testing. People need shelter and basic survival needs met first before you can even begin to try to address issues like addiction or mental illness.