Is it really necessary to send humans to those places just to get the knock-on benefits? Couldn’t we do those things directly, without going there?

It seems to me that, today, those who have the money to spend on these endeavors would only do so if there were perceived short-term benefits to themselves. That means they plan to exploit the resources, or increase their own power somehow.

I know the good engineers that make this happen are doing it for the challenge and in the pursuit of knowledge, and I know that’s why we poors support it, but that doesn’t “pay the bills.” What is the motivation behind the money? Why are they really doing this?

  • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    it would be much more efficient not to do the gimmicks, just do the science and not allow public sentiment to dictate what’s viable.

    Probably, but sometimes having to meet real world challenges leads you down pathways that wouldn’t otherwise have been considered.

    • mirshafie@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Sure. Let those goals be useful and reachable, not some narcissist’s fantasy about colonizing a dead planet.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Musk aside, colonizing Mars is absolutely achievable, and could be very useful. Having one point where humans exist is limiting, and creates a potential for one point of failure. Spreading out gives us many more opportunities for doing interesting things, and it also prevents Earth being wiped out (probably by us, but potentially something else) meaning the end of humanity.

        I think you’re letting your hatred of billionaires make you hate everything they’re associated with, which isn’t correct or good. Make an actual argument for it being bad, not just saying billionaires support it.

        • mirshafie@europe.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          There are about a hundred things that are more readily achiveable and useful than going to Mars or even the Moon. We have a climate crisis here on Earth, we’re facing severe challenges in agriculture, and almost a billion people live in abject poverty.

          On that last point: what do you think unlocks more scientific potential - funneling trillions into research for a colony on the Moon, or making sure hundreds of millions of children get food, water, medicine and an education? My bet is on the latter, by a loooooooong fucking margin. You’ve got your Mozarts and Einsteins wasting away in squalor, and that’s just a bad use of our potential. Morality doesn’t even have to enter the equation.

          I’m not hung up on the disgusting billionaires. They’re not the only narcissists around.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            There are about a hundred things that are more readily achiveable and useful than going to Mars or even the Moon.

            Luckily we’re doing billions of other things. We aren’t doing Luna/Mars missions and nothing else.

          • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            That’s a false dichotomy. We could very easily as a species support a space colony AND provide for the welfare of everybody if we collectively wanted to. One does not preclude the other, nor make it any more difficult to accomplish.

            • mirshafie@europe.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              Start. By. Feeding. Children.

              Then you can have as many space colonies as you want.

                • mirshafie@europe.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  Of course not. But it’s people like you on the aggregate that prop up con men, and it does directly compete with effective measures to fix our own planet.

                  • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 days ago

                    But it’s people like you on the aggregate that prop up con men,

                    Fuck off. You and Elon both. You’re just making assumptions about me now.

      • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        not some narcissist’s fantasy about colonizing a dead planet.

        Fuck Elon. Humanity’s dream of colonising space existed long before he was even conceived.

        • mirshafie@europe.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          It’s still a moronic goal to focus on at this point in our evolution. We’re trying to run before knowing how to walk.

          • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Why so? Honestly, there’s nothing about our current tech level that makes it impossible. It’s solely an engineering project and required political will.