• GalacticRobot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I have never seen a Framework in the wild, however I applaud their approach, but even when taking repair costs in consideration, Frameworks are more expensive than simply upgrading to a newer laptop and using the old laptop for some other purpose. I can’t imagine with the rampocalypse that they easily survive, but I hope they do, I wish other manufacturers would make repair a higher priority.

    • runner_g@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      My anecdotal experience - my Asus gaming laptop died about 6 months ago. with a lot of trouble shooting, I determined it was most likely the mobo. I decided to go with a framework, and was able to bring over my hard drive and ram, saving me like $400.

        • runner_g@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Getting the framework driver’s was painful. I needed to download them over wifi, but wifi wasn’t working because it needed the driver. okay, download on another computer and install via USB, nope. USB drivers aren’t working either. I ended up spotting my hard drive into my desktop, downloading the drivers that way, and then moving it back to the framework laptop to install.

          • webhead@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            21 hours ago

            I’ve literally never had a computer need drivers to make basic USB work in the past probably 20 years. I had a bleeding edge ai 350 framework right even when it came out. Linux was a little flaky with my sound but everything else worked. Same in Windows. Maybe I needed Wi-Fi drivers, don’t recall, but I know USB worked without any. I’m really curious how you needed USB drivers of all things genuinely. I mean you installed the OS presumably from a thumb drive so how would that not work in the same os after installing? Lol.

            • runner_g@piefed.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              19 hours ago

              It may be a separate issue to drivers, because I have this other issue where after waking up from sleep, I have to either reboot or physically remove the USB port and plug it back in to make the USB work. I’ve disabled “allow windows to put this device to sleep” for every single USB titled thing in device manager, so I’m not sure what the issue is. I plan on installing a small linux partition at some point to play around and see if I like it.

              • webhead@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                14 hours ago

                If you really moved the hard drive from one laptop to another without reinstalling the OS, that’s probably going to cause issues. It’ll “work” seemingly but it’s gonna be messy like this. You’re going to spend more time hunting weird shit than you would just doing a reinstall imo.

                I’d backup what you need to and start over or you’re probably going to keep having strange issues.

            • runner_g@piefed.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              19 hours ago

              I took the working hard drive, OS and all, from my previous laptop and slotted into the framework. No OS installation needed.

          • KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            USB drivers aren’t working either.

            What the hell do you mean, USB drivers need to be downloaded? Isn’t that standardized and included with the system?

          • spectrums_coherence@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            If you have a desktop with internet connection, maybe a USB stick would suffice?

            There is also USB tethering from a phone that could work.

            I am not defending framework. They should try to do better (maybe windows is the bottleneck? not sure). Just offering solutions to people who might encounter this problem later.

    • artyom@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Frameworks are more expensive than simply upgrading to a newer laptop

      They’re absolutely not.

      can’t imagine with the rampocalypse that they easily survive

      Being that you can and have been able to buy them without RAM or storage, I’d say they’re better-positioned than anyone.

      • GalacticRobot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Umm, not sure if you have seen Framework’s prices.

        The current 13in with a weak intel processor is $1850 (and you can’t get it until October). To buy an equivalent Dell? Around $1,000 and you can get it tomorrow. The upgrade cost for the motherboard (say you want to switch to AMD), will cost you $900. For that $3k you can buy 3 Dells all with ram and storage.

        And no, they aren’t positioned well without RAM as their newer ones use LPCAMM2. You don’t have that just lying around.

        • spectrums_coherence@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          That is just plain not true. If you are a enthusiast and know where to look then you definitely can find better deal than framework, but getting a dell (or even better dell?) for half of the price is simple not true.

          On Dell website https://www.dell.com/en-us/shop/dell-laptops/new-xps-14-laptop/spd/xps-da14260-laptop, a core ultra 7 358H with 32GB Ram and 1TB SDD is 2749$ with no touch screen and a 2K display and windows Home.

          On framework website https://frame.work/products/laptop13pro-intel-ultra-3/configuration/new, the same processor, ram, storage, with 2.8k touch screen, plus windows pro cost 2299$

          Framework is cheaper than dell if you don’t try to find deals or buy older models.

          If you buy older models, then framework don’t need to replace ram, I can upgrade my laptop to kitted out ryzen AI 9 for only 849$, https://frame.work/products/mainboard-amd-ai300?v=FRANTE0009 with my existing 64GB of ram. I don’t think you can get any laptop close to that quality with this price.

        • artyom@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          The current 13in with a weak intel processor is $1850

          Is not at all a weak processor. Intel currently makes the best x86 mobile processors on the market. The entire point is that you don’t have to buy a whole new computer when you upgrade. You just get an updated motherboard and slap it into the existing chassis.

          The upgrade cost for the motherboard (say you want to switch to AMD), will cost you $900. For that $3k you can buy 3 Dells all with ram and storage.

          And all 3 will be outdated when it comes time to upgrade. And they’ll all be shittier than the Framework.

          they aren’t positioned well without RAM as their newer ones use LPCAMM2

          That is 1 of 5 computers they sell.

    • spectrums_coherence@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I would like to offer a slightly different perspective: I believe framework is uniquely positioned to survive the ram apocalypse (at least respect to their scale).

      In the sense that, framework user can keep purchasing and upgrading components, like battery, screen, speaker, hinge, expansion card, without needing to worry about ram prices, and framework can profit from these component without needing to subsidize ram prices.

      That being said, as a smaller company, they certainly don’t have the same amount of bargaining power on ram as most big players, and the launch of LPCAM2 is a bit risky, since that pervents people from purchasing new ram/board/laptops given the current ram prices.

      • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Does a new generation mobo/chip combination generally still support the older generation of RAM?

        • spectrums_coherence@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Nope, not on intel core ultra 3 unfortunately (unless you have LPCAMM2 lying around, which is unlikely), that is the risky part I mentioned in the end.

          • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            that is the risky part I mentioned in the end.

            That’s what I get for only reading 2/3 of your comment before responding.