

Kinda late to the party aren’t they?


Kinda late to the party aren’t they?
Big fan of both, don’t know why it has to be one or the other for an OSS credentials manager
On an individual level, you only need one or the other. But which one is best for you may be different than which one is best for me.
Lol, no.
The mess of databases you would need to replicate what is simple with organizations and collections is definitely not easier or more flexible.
Not really and not nearly at the same level
Shared passwords
Unless you go out of your way to make it available to the internet, it will only be available on your local network, and you’re a much smaller target than the cloud provider.
Or want to share a subset of passwords with someone.


This one person probably doesn’t know how to code, therefore no one does. Is that really your argument?


They saw Jensen say engineers should be burning tokens to keep warm and thought “fuck it, let’s do this”.


They’re trying to argue national security for Anthropic, a US based company.


Based on a Debian version for which long term support ended 6 years ago…


I’ve got my autoexec.bat and config.sys ready to go.


That has already been closed


Maybe if you’re using an m-disc


They’re afraid of the way phalluses make them feel.


I don’t know, rockets are pretty phallic.


You forgot all the variations of “Smokin Meats”.


If the user is female, a report should be submitted by her closest male relative.


I figure he means they all shuffled off the plane looking at the floor. Unless they all kept in touch after beating off together on a plane they have no way to know if anyone told someone else afterwards.
You mean you don’t like having three screens worth of squashfs entries flash past when you try to run mount?