• Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Have they tried making it better, I feel like I’m more likely to become addicted to it if it was good.

  • BigMacHole@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    5 hours ago

    We’re going to MAKE people ADDICTED by making a REALLY Good Product! SOLVING annoying Problems! TREATING Customers respectfully! FORCING ourselves Onto people like Donald Trump on Little Girls!

  • Kaligalis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    13 hours ago

    No shit, Sherlock.
    And people would actually happily get addicted to an AI assistant which is reliable, safe, capable, kind, and fast.
    They really should try making a great product. Then they don’t need any tricks. People love great products.

    • AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      And local and under your control. As a “second brain” that isn’t sentient but intelligent to assist you AI has great potential. In a few years we’ll probably have the models and new hardware to run good enough models locally on cheap enough hardware.

      But by then they’ll have drummed enough support for “muh copyright” to buy legislation for AI licensing and make all AI models have to pay a license fee to… “someone”. Like that poor writer who had his work illegally read by an AI. So then no open source models can exist and they have the monopoly. Big win for the little guy lol.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    17 hours ago

    If they want people addicted to an AI, it’s going to have to be a lot better than fucking Copilot.

    As slop generators go, it’s about the sloppiest.

  • kablez@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    20 hours ago

    My non Linux savvy spouse is currently dual booting Linux Mint because Windows has become so frustrating to use.

    Mint isn’t perfect. We’ve run into a few bugs and shortcomings. But there’s a big difference between dealing with genuine issues in an OS and using one that feels actively hostile and designed to exploit the user.

    If both experiences can be frustrating, why choose the one that’s frustrating by design (unless you absolutely have to) ?

    • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Yeah every time I get on my laptop it’s a little more unrecognisable and unusable to me. Will be getting in Linux as soon as I get a chance.

          • TDCN@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            17 hours ago

            A good place to start, if what you do for those two hours a month is just a browser and such, is a live USB with Linux mint (or something like that) and then there is no commitment until you are ready.

        • Meatwagon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          SSDs costing $300 for me. For some reason my current drives refuse to partition. I got an old laptop on it, but it barely works regardless of what OS is on it.

          • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Older refurbished Thinkpads are a good and cheap way to go. They save a ton of compatibility headaches which only eat time. Linux is very economical on hardware resources. Or, just use an old pc. I work as a programmer and my main PC is 15 years old now.

      • magnue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I’ve strongly enjoyed cachyOS. Cue downvotes for this, but I installed ClaudeCode (any other cli would work fine too like opencode etc) and gave it a persistent memory as an OS helper of sorts when I get stuck.

        Probably moronic to quit windows over AI integration and then set up Linux with the exact same vision just in a completely custom way.

        • snugglesthefalse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          40 minutes ago

          I’ve just started messing around with cachy after using mint for a month and a bit, honestly kinda liking it with KDE over mint now.

  • finalarbiter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    155
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ah yes, Cortana and Copilot both suck, but surely third time’s the charm. And when Scout is, inevitably, unpopular as well? We’ll see what they call number four.

    • Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Is there any fundamental difference between Copilot and Scout, or is it just a straight up rebranding?

      • finalarbiter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        19 hours ago

        My impression is that scout is specifically going to be an agentic ai. Agentic ai platforms are supposedly a little more competent than chatbots, but still subject to the same llm chicanery and enormous energy usage.

        It’s hard to compare against copilot because MS has called a ton of distinct things copilot (see the diagram below).

        diagram of different MS products called copilot

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        Not sure why that had to come on automatically at maximum volume every time, but the number of times I’ve finished backing up and re-imaging a computer at 3 AM, on to have her start hollering at the exact moment my head hits the pillow, is too damn many

    • Pycorax@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Cortana was actually really good on Windows Phone but they dumbed it down and added all sort of crap to it by the time it was integrated onto the desktop. They could’ve doubled down on whatads it good but nope.

      • @pycorax I second this, Windows Phone 8.1/10 was a godsend in a world of Android/iPhone duopoly (even if made by Microslop) and Cortana was smart enough to almost do everything you could ask of it (unlike the “couldn’t understand what you said” or “calling Superfun New Toy From China” instead of “Super from Building A” that “AI” assistants of its time said).
        @finalarbiter

    • minkymunkey_7_7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Yeah but one day they will hack it, like every form of advertising and addiction that was pushed on us since tobacco. This is just a new frontier that is unknown right now, like explaining the ridiculous idea of future social media addiction to a user in 2005.