RmDebArc_5@feddit.org to Animemes@ani.socialEnglish · 4 days agoah yesani.socialimagemessage-square112linkfedilinkarrow-up1520arrow-down11
arrow-up1519arrow-down1imageah yesani.socialRmDebArc_5@feddit.org to Animemes@ani.socialEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square112linkfedilink
minus-squarenightlily@leminal.spacelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down10·edit-23 days agoSo you want others who want others dead for the crime of existing, dead for the crime of existing? Edit: clearly I should have used /s for the obvious joking wordplay on a meme community
minus-squarePollo_Jack@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·4 days agoIt isn’t a difficult concept. x wants nightlily dead for being German. y wants x dead for wanting Germans to be dead. It isn’t recursive.
minus-squareFreeAZ@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 days agoNo dumbass, you literally just listed their crime, its not “existing”. If they were just existing they wouldn’t be targeted, they wouldn’t be guilty of genocide.
minus-squareGrey Cat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·4 days agoExactly. You get it ! You have to be intolerant of the intolerant.
So you want others who want others dead for the crime of existing, dead for the crime of existing?
Edit: clearly I should have used /s for the obvious joking wordplay on a meme community
It isn’t a difficult concept. x wants nightlily dead for being German. y wants x dead for wanting Germans to be dead.
It isn’t recursive.
No dumbass, you literally just listed their crime, its not “existing”. If they were just existing they wouldn’t be targeted, they wouldn’t be guilty of genocide.
Exactly. You get it ! You have to be intolerant of the intolerant.