• poVoq@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    There are always people that have time to invest in low risk activities but can’t invest them in high risk ones, usually because of dependents they need to take care off.

    A support network for civil disobedience can never exist. The state would shut it down immediatly. And yet disobedience must occur if the system is to truly change.

    Civil disobedience literally can’t exist without a support network and there are plenty of examples where it has existed with the state doing little to nothing to prevent that. There are always ways to fly under the radar for such support networks.

    Destroying flock cameras is not a bad idea, but it is largely inconsequential. Style over substance so to say.

    • mildseason@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah having dependents does add another layer of difficulty. Get them involved lol

      I think people can part-time disobedience. Of course having a support network would make things easier. Maybe I’m just having trouble imagining.

      I do think destroying flock cameras is worthwile. We definitely need more style and I’d argue it’s quite substantial too. For every camera destroyed it drains the budget and limits how many more can be installed.