• village604@adultswim.fan
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s both. Costs decrease with scaled up production, but only if there’s demand for it. Otherwise crops are just wasted.

        Plus, it’s not like 100% of crops go to humans in the first place. Harvests get graded, with the first few levels being for human consumption, and the last being for animal or industrial use.

    • KombatWombat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      It is much easier to increase output for crops than livestock. The reason meat is so cheap in the US is that the government uses taxes to subsidize it, and producers torture their animals to cut costs.

      • village604@adultswim.fan
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        If you don’t have the market for it, scaling ends up with food waste.

        And meat really isn’t cheap, relatively. At least good cuts. You could have a full vegan diet for less than the price of meat (per calorie), even before COVID.

        Although, all that’s about to change since 1/3 of the planet’s fertilizer production was wiped out.

        • gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Although, all that’s about to change since 1/3 of the planet’s fertilizer production was wiped out.

          i wouldn’t worry about that too much. these things sound scary but we’re damn good at industry in basically any country these days, we’ll make new fertilizer somehow.