I have definitely mentioned Marion Zimmer Bradley when her books get recommended. So yes? But also I feel like dead artists is when you really can attempt to separate the art from the artists (in the case of MZB I’ve heard there’s weird/questionable passages in the books, so can you really?)
I don’t want to know about Sam Neill’s controveries.
Depends on the situation. I have an uncle who is, for his generation (boomer), fairly progressive-minded.
For years, he repeated that his favorite book was “The Education of Little Tree” which was published in 76, and to my understanding takes a pretty irreverent and sometimes satirical stance on much of society’s generally accepted social norms and formal institutions. It has an environmentalist tone and is critical of the prejudice that the indigenous protagonist faces.
The weird part is that the author, “Forrest Carter,” was actually Asa Earl Carter who was formerly a prominent Klan member and speech writer for George Wallace, one of the premiere racist ghoul politicians of the American South. Ever heard the speech that goes “segregation now, segregation tomorrow, and segregation forever”? Yeah, that’s a George Wallace speech that was written by Carter. It’s been known that they’re the same guy since the early 90’s, but my uncle still wasn’t aware of it in the 2010’s.
My Uncle’s a pretty reasonable guy and he’s capable of critical thinking. I don’t know why Carter went on to write a book that was critical of prejudice after spending his early life being super fucking turbo-racist, but the guy’s long dead and while it certainly recontextualizes his anti-prejudice work, it’s not like you can’t still like his books. When I shared the info with my uncle about Carter’s identity, I expected him to take it much the way I did like “Well that’s pretty weird. Wonder what the hell happened to have made the same man write such different things in his life. Sucks he was a racist,” but instead it really seemed like he took it personally. He got really defensive about something that has literally been settled fact since the 90s, suggesting it was all lies even though I was showing him the Wikipedia page for Carter. I even heard him mutter something under his breath after the conversation which is waaay more petty than I’ve ever seen him act.
If I don’t think the person I’m talking to is capable of critical thought and nuance, I’ll keep things like that to myself, but my uncle and I have had tons of interesting conversations. In my head this was just another one of those. It’s not like I was accusing my uncle of being racist. After all, he had no idea. I thought I was just sharing a bizarre detail about an author he liked.
He may have simply been in shock, it’s not unusual for someone to be in denial at first when they learn something like this about someone they looked up to.
It may even be healthy to be initially skeptical, makes you less easy to manipulate with slander.
Sooner or later you have to face the facts, at least when they’re proven and well-established, but it can take time to process that information
I don’t know why Carter went on to write a book that was critical of prejudice after spending his early life being super fucking turbo-racist
Maybe he came across some dignity later in life? People are always changing and that’s something we should all be respecting.
Yeah, my thoughts. Cancel culture makes people forget this. Not everyone is a mini hitler (i.e won’t change)
I almost suggested that, but the story goes that the reason he chose “Forrest” as a pseudonym when writing the book was because of Nathan Bedford Forrest, founder of the Klan. People contain multitudes. I can’t claim to know why he did what he did, but nothing I’ve read about the man (admittedly little) indicates that he was sorry for what he’d done. Ashamed perhaps, but even that I’m just guessing based on the fact that he tried changing his identity and denied being Asa Carter.
the only answer to this question can possibly be ‘sometimes’.
ya gotta be able to ‘read the room’ as to its acceptability and appropriateness… or stfu
I too think it depends case by case. I note the severity of the offense and the impact of bringing something up. How ethically strong do I feel about it? Will the individual at least consider my words? Is it an allegation. If so, how confident am I in the allegation to be true?
I do often bring things up though because most people dont know a lot of things
I assume they already know and have made the decision to not let it bother them.
Since he came up in conversation yesterday, I’ll use him as an example: say someone comes up and says how Chris Brown is such a good singer.
If I have any opinion on his actual singing, the conversation can go well even if I think, say, Drake is a better singer. (I did explicitly choose two R&B singers with different controversies.)
But if I say “yeah but did you see the police pictures of what he did to Rihanna’s face?”, then I feel like we’re about to be in a fight. They’re a fan, they probably already know. I just don’t see that conversation going well.
You could say that you don’t like artists who abuse others without directly referring to the specific incident, but if they ask you about who you like, you really have to be careful who you put up on your pedestal, lest they call you out as a hypocrite.
So I let it go.
Now if an American is telling me he likes Chris Brown, he likes Drake, and he supports Elon Musk and Donald Trump, he’s pretty much told me his position on women (and minorities) and I know this is a person to keep at arm’s length. I’ll speak to them, I’ll be polite to them, but I’m not going to introduce them to my younger sister or her 13-year-old daughter (if I had a younger sister, and if she had a 13-year-old daughter). But if they just wanna talk music, sure, we can have that conversation. I’d rather speak with someone who thinks it’s not okay to beat women, who thinks it’s not okay for grown men to have inappropriate relations with young girls, but if we’re just a couple people online separated by a huge distance talking about music? That’s fine.
This approach works for a lot of different topics.
For example, I’m an atheist. If someone I’m talking to is just brings up their faith I’m not going to go out of my way to start an arguement.
But if they’re start being argumentative, like coming up with bad faith arguments to bash gays or atheists, then I’ll push back. Usually gently at first, but if they keep going then the kiddie gloves come off.
Thankfully, most people I interact with (at least irl) know to not be an asshole. I get that not everybody has that luxury though.
I keep it to myself.
I don’t always mention it if they are alive either. I try to pick my battles, and i’d rather focus on other boycotts such as those from BDS.
Idk why mine or anyone’s opinions on a celebrity matter. Our entire culture and all of our cultural products are connected to evil in some way. The NBA and the NFL support genocide. Chris Brown hits women. How many movies have Harvey Weinstein attached?
My personal favorite rapper Kanye West is an anti semite and Trump supporter.
I generally believe in BDSing, so we should try not to support these people, but life is difficult and the things we have available to bring is joy are all complicated. Life is complicated and nuanced. Some people don’t have the ability to reject all of media while they try to find some solace in a heartless world.
Try to reject the things you can. But keep in mind that not everyone can.
BDSing?
Boycott Divest Sanction. It’s a strategy being used to leverage economic power on bad actors.
Now I have a term for it. Awesome!
I shut my mouth. Living in the modern world, that might be the last stale nugget of joy they have left.
what is wrong with you that you care about any of this. seriously.
of all the things to get morally righteous about, being angry at folks for liking a celebrity is pretty wild.
of all the things to get morally righteous about, being angry at folks for liking a celebrity is pretty wild.
Uhhhh didn’t say i was, lol
Depends on why they like them. If it’s for their craft and that has nothing to do with the problematic past, eh… whatever. If it’s because of their opinions on something and they don’t live up to them e.g somebody likes a boxer for their anti-racism stance but that boxer was a racist, I’ll tell 'em.
I would legit want to hear how they handle that dissonance. If they’re emotionally intelligent people they’re probably honest with themselves about whatever that bad streak is and probably have something interesting to say about it.
If not, then whatever. Not my job to arbitrate people’s morals or tastes.
you assume there is any dissonance.
some folks can just enjoy shit without agonizing about it.
my sister loves disney. she just likes it. she doesn’t ever think about disney in a negative light. it’s her happy place. and if you tried to paint disney negatively she’d tell you to go fuck yourself and stop being a miserable person.
Do you like Mozart? He was probably racist.
Is that how the conversation would go? Like if you were having it?
Sure, why not?
I mean. It’s just that the story begins and ends there with that one sentence. I don’t know, did he write about hating Moores or anyone in any of his vocal works?
Girlfriend loves Taylor Swift, music news whatever. It makes her happy, it’s all I want for her, so yea, I just let her have that
Edit…oh deceased woops
I let it be, even if the person is still alive. Anyone can “allege” anything against anyone. Plus, if the friend is a devout follower of someone genuinely controversial, then there’s already a good chance I’m not that close to them and would be cutting them out of my life anyway.
If we’re talking MJ. Tell them.
We’re not (i was thinking of madonna), but speaking of MJ:
I’m so annoyed that internet discussion seemed to go back and forth on whether his interactions with kids were wrong, before finally settling on the conclusion they were, in the wake of Epstein + the MJ movie being released. People would make up very elaborate explanations for why he was having kids over and why it was okay, and you’d get absolutely piled on for not supporting that explanation.
For me personally my mom already told me he was bad before i started using the internet, so I’ve probably gone through more gaslighting with MJ than over any other issue - kids i went to school with were arguing with me over it at like 9 years old. I didn’t know the full reason yet.
Just such a clear issue
You seem to have followed that topic far more than me. So I’d like to state what I objectively understood from the mj case and then ask you. Please do not feel offended, I never like people being idolized but also not their image being damaged with accusations.
That being said, from what I understood he had a lot of kids around him which is at least unusual in any case but there was no objective proof for sexual abuse.
So my honest question: had this been proven? This was such a hot topic that it was impossible for me to follow the facts. (of course in a possible connection with Epstein - which I knew nothing about then - it might seem obvious now)
Thanks.
It’s fine, i’m not here to start arguments.
Here are some sources
- ABC, 2003: “inside MJ’s Odd World.” https://abcnews.com/2020/story?id=123607&page=1 This is the top result if you search about it and probaboy all you need to read. But i’ll return to this comment with more sources, i need to post to make sure i don’t lose what i typed below.
- Guardian, 2003 : “MJ still lets kids sleep in his bed” MJ actually had to settle out of court to get a molestation lawsuit to disappear, as this article mentions https://www.theguardian.com/media/2003/feb/04/broadcasting.michaeljacksontrial
So to answer your questions:
- Yes it’s proven that MJ invited kids over for sleepovers.
- It was so well known that he did this that the media was reporting on it frequently and he went to court for it -~~ presumably it wasn’t proven that he molested them because AFAIK he never went to jail or anything. ~~
- But as you said, the issue is that he shouldn’t have been creating those situations in the first place, because:
- 1), it’s creepy enough ny default,
-
- kids shouldn’t be taken away from trusted adults fo stay over with celebrities,
-
- MJ is aware thst this is wring and puts him in a highkply precarious legal position.
You’d therefore assume that he was doing this in the hopes thst he might one day get away with mokesting a child, or that he wss doing it as the first part of grooming them to become his close friends and from there who knows.
It’s a dereliction of “responsibility” as a celebrity and as an adult to essentially provide access to yourself as a visitor attraction for kids. Public meetings with fans (conventions, signings, concerts) and answering fan mail is fine.
I’m surprised it didn’t go worse. I do like his music though and i appreciate he had a poor childhood himself which contributes to making these poor judgements.
(I believe MJ comes up in Epsteins Emails, either because epstein celebrates him, or because he’s a visitor to the island. Probably the former, there’s not much outcry about it. I’ll look for a source for that.)
But still, thst does not sound as if it’s proven he molested them. And if he did, he should rot in hell of course.
I’m just still not sure that he wasn’t as naive innocent as he seemed. I really hate this.
madonna is deceased?
No i just made the post about dead celebrities despite thinking about madonna. I already decided not to yap to the pereon in question about madonna being a creep, and the conversation in questiin happened a year or so ago but i remembered it and made a post inspired by it
ah, gotcha!
So Madonna isn’t dead
True, haha, i think i added “deceased” because it makes it more clear cut? Asking the same about living celebrities is a different issue because they run cover-up on their misdeeds, so there’s usually lots of plausible deniability. I didn’t think i’d mention what prompted me to make the post until that guy asked if it was MJ, which was a good guess.
I was trying to look up what the Madonna controversy or allegations are and found this article about allegations of human trafficking and sexual abuse but then I saw this article about Malawi where her previous staff became head of education and this article about her healthy children
If this is the controversy or allegation, I’m not personally convinced as an outsider looking in 🤷♀️. Seems to me that people are bothered by her sexual advocacy including lgbt+ rights and though not saying theres 100% chance of this but I don’t see any evidence of human trafficking or exploitation so far. The wrongful termination suit as well as Malawi’s stance on societal norms just leads me to believe they have agenda against her.
She had sex with a minor and she continues the pattern in a way by having relationships with men much younger than her today. (Not underage though.)
Oh I haven’t heard or seen that one re: minor. The younger guys ive known about.








