It will only restrict his ability to get new loans, and make his collaterals worthless. But he probably spent most of the money they gave him, and like with twitter, he shifted the assets around in his network of companies, like a thimblerigger.
But that’s kind of like saying that inflation will make the rich poor, which is also not true.
The money doesn’t have to be real for Elon to be able to use his stock as collateral for billion dollar loans. So he in fact has real money, that banks gave him, and that he will never pay back.
Well, don’t use your private phone for work related stuff.
I think Firefox does that just as well, and also allows you to edit them.
You can do all that and deny that you support it, but by your actions you do indeed support it.
Or can you give money to a terrorist organization because you support their good humanitarian work in some region, without being considered a supporter of said terrorist organization?
Your claim is that I am stretching the definition of support, by implying that giving money to companies doing all those bad things means supporting them, yet you have to agree that all examples above commonly are referred to as support.
That means you do in fact support (financially) the horrors described here if you buy milk and/or meat.
q.e.d.
Would you say that you support a good cause by giving money? Like a donation for doctors without borders, or world central kitchen?
Are you supporting your family by paying their bills? Is the government supporting low income families by giving them money?
If you buy milk or meat, you support this with your money.
We could, if not capitalism and free market