I love the people who say anarchism / communism are utopian and would never work in practice without negative externalities- and then go bootlicking for representative democracy and capitalism

Love the post. I would argue the latter (single overarching model concept) is antithetical to anarchist theory

Yes and we should at least downvote it while we have critical mass

Cool guy you are. Your “guarantee” isn’t worth the bits in your text given we don’t know each other - neither is your disrespect.

But hey keep feeling better than someone else you don’t know if that helps you.

I’m happy as is with my knowledge and political orientation. Was just trying to widen your lens - to understand why someone may support a political doctrine: anarchy, ghat comes from theory and practice which contributed to many positive changes across societies.

… also still waiting for your alternate frame

Name me another leftist ideology that is perfectly constructed and has achieved utopia on mass scale.

I’ll wait while you come up something specific. Until then I will use my ideology as a set of guiding principles towards a more equal society.

Thanks. Also, read theory if you are struggling the above. It helped me

So you’re saying human civilization always operated under a hierarchical body politic without decentralized decision making?

Serious ahistorical claim.

By the way “anarchy” in the sense of childish movie plot stuff is not what any adherent of the ideology is about. Anarchy is a spectrum and set of guiding principles (like any political belief system), and one can argue that forms of what I might identify as anarchistic political structures have and do exist in many political systems. Just like socialism exists in neoconservative governments, and fascism in democracy ect…

Like every single political ideology you rube

This the money comment IMo

Communal anarchy is as valid a political orientation as any other

I don’t fundamentally disagree with the principle, but it’s easier to police malignant behavior if nudity is confined to limited social spaces (eg. beaches, gyms, saunas, ect…)

Otherwise you give creepos the ability to ruin random public spaces randomly with very little enforcement potential - but I guess it depends on what of the two restricted scenarios is the lesser evil.

I am somewhat ambivalent FWIW

The curse of a normal distribution is in the tails