

It’s a finger under heavy magnification, if you’re not joking.
If you are, it’s because they wanted to demonstrate how e-fish-ient their new technology is.


It’s a finger under heavy magnification, if you’re not joking.
If you are, it’s because they wanted to demonstrate how e-fish-ient their new technology is.


Haha that picture shows one on a finger. It’s literally half the size of a single ridge of your fingerprint. Like a speck of dust.



The robot’s electrokinetic propulsion exploits microscale physics. Platinum electrodes drive fluid flow with no moving parts at around 60 nanoamperes. Four electrodes enable translation, rotation, and arcing. They currently operate at 1 volt, but could reach 10 times faster speeds near water’s electrolysis limit.
Electric field propulsion, apparently


I always assumed nanoscale robots would need to be lithography-based. Seems that was right. On the other hand, I assumed a MEMS actuator… their solid state propulsion is very interesting.


I won’t stop them, I will just socially shame them with an intent to stop them.
You have all the tact of a conversion therapy camp. I have nothing more to say to a closed-minded person like you.


No. Gatekeeping was the polite way to say that you have no fucking right to stop someone from doing what they enjoy, as long as they aren’t harming someone else. I personally don’t read YA novels, but I will protect that right for everyone else.
The correct term, rather than gatekeeper, would be fascist. You can fuck right off if you’re going to try controlling what media a person consumes. If you truly think what you’re saying, you are a morally bankrupt human.


Ew, that’s not true either. Lemmy is NOT the place for gatekeeping assholes. Take that bullshit to X.


Adults are allowed to read things written for children. Shaming people for that is ageist as fuck.
There are LOTS of good reasons to stop engaging with HP, but this ain’t one of them.


Extra big ass-language model


Earth (and life) will be around long after humans have destroyed themselves.


I’m just saying that the proposed solution will be ineffective at filtering bots, but create a false sense of security.


It’s trivial to automate browser clicks like that with AI these days.
But yeah, more expensive than an API call.


If you can connect to a site using a browser, so can a bot.


What stops someone from validating an account, then posting using a bot?


Dry ass-lips


Why would the US want fair competition?
Like I said, the consumers do not benefit from the tariffs, the nation does.


This is actually one of the very few places that US tariffs make sense. (Not from a consumer perspective of course, but from a nationalist industry protection point of view.) The rest of the tariffs the US places are silly because there isn’t much other manufacturing in the US to protect.


And we would’ve gotten away with it too, if it weren’t for you meddling fossil fuels, and cows too!
I don’t understand why people crop comics. It takes more effort and it makes you an asshole. Why would anyone do that?
RLHF was a fundamental mistake. Human feedback almost always trains an AI to be sycophantic because humans in general are super easy to flatter.
We are building the perfect addiction machine, far more powerful than social media is, and it actively undermines the honesty of the system.