What the actual fuck?

I was going to write blue/greenish. How can that possibly be a thing??

Are these people aware that the only thing they mock/joke about are themselves for buying such crap?

.slop ?

French of the 80s? I hated the haircut of “Capitaine Flam” ;)

Meh. but the rest of the outfit style was pretty cool.

Skill issue.

Captain Future. Chevalier du Zodiaque (Saint Seiya), Inspector Gadget, maybe M.A.S.K.? Doctor Snuggles? :D

I hate these questions, i might as well just write my exact birthday on public internet. :)

Ohh :D I forgot about that :D

Told my wife she owed me 5 bucks from the bet.

Statistics say that there is a decent amount of Boyfriends for who this would be an improvement.

Is that a threat?

I never had problems with feet, but i can’t wait until the current foot-craze subsides.
It’s like with everything these days. someone makes a mildly interesting/funny/sexy/whatever thing and for unfathomable reasons 12% of humanity or 96% of humans on the internet latch on to it and make it the core of their worldview/humour/identity until the next thing pops up.

STOP THE FEET

is this a “how to eat an elephant” type of question? (one bite at a time)

[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hJG_B2qIqC0](CAKE - Fashion Nugget - Friend)

wrong text on the picture. that one should read: “getting 200+ gambling ads daily while having the gambling gene and not gambling anyway.”

The picture that goes with the original text would be someone not even noticing the bullets flying and missing.

And people say studying philosophy is irrelevant for every day life.
here we were just laughing about a bird / venting about a predatory species, and suddenly we are talking ethics and the question if moral(?) applies to animals when discussed by humans.

You are obviously right, in that i place my “pets” over a random predator. but then again, is the comparison truely equal if the heron is your “pet”? the fish seem to me pretty passive in all this, except in their inability to not attract things that want to eat them.

Is good and bad or right and wrong even applicable to animals in nature? and does a fish in a domesticated pond even fall under “living in nature”? would that even make a difference?

Or is the fault my own for not making sure the fish are protected?

Getting back to the beginning, do i have an obligation to moderate my language in any way?
Is it mean to wish for the heron to starve?
Could maybe a case be made that it is a request for poetic justice that one heron lives and a fish dies, and another one starves and a fish lives.

Philosophy is the shit.

I wonder if the people defending the damn bird would have reacted differently if they had watched it pull a 30 year old Koi out of their pond and flew away with it.
I knew that fish for more than half my life. My kids grew up feeding and watching them.

There is always more to a story, and it’s good to remember that first impressions of a situation are often only that.

They are trying.

Life is more than just survival.

Well, i’m not munching on your chicken nuggets, am i?

exactly!