This is how the democrats lose the next election.

GJ snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. Again

Man who acts like robot seeks to teach robot to act like him

Maybe. There’s still strong disapproval around it. I can imagine many will still hide it.

So you mean a Rothschild. Not the family? In any case bad as that is I feel genocide might be a little worse.

Yeah. People seem to forget about us for some reason but here’s a handy link.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transgender_genocide

And maybe get educated (or go fuck yourself)

Surely you’re not bringing up the Antisemitic conspiracy theories related to that family?

Yupppp and yeh, she is wholly in support of it

Actual fan or not. You’re still in the shoes of the fan.

Support genocide or not these comments screech “I’m not responsible” despite the blood on your hands for your silent approval of it… There’s much in this world to be obsessively dismissive of and what you chose is dumb. There are over 3000 billionaires and this dumb bitchs part of that should not be dismissed so easily.

You are the Harry potter fan telling us you don’t give a shit. Did the comic offend you? Your argument rings of hurt and betrayal at the reflection of reality it serves you.

I don’t give a shit. Your argument that were screaming into the void is hollow and rings of hurt feelings and acknowledgment of the hurt.

This isn’t a noble grand stand. Yelling at us to defend billionaires who want genocide isn’t a good place to be. You’re just butthurt and picking a minority group to hate.

In your example you say reducing your individual CO2 print is hard. It’s not. It just has no real effect against the larger problem. The same thing is true here.

And that’s why the ads will always exist and people will always complain about them. It also funds them to eventually find ways around your individual solutions.

I guess answers like these misunderstand that you’re fighting a losing battle.

Mostly because the problem is systemic, so the response should be as well. Your answer was individualistic.

Individual change always places the blame on you. The real focus should be on the system that puts you under this pressure.

Fair

You’re supposed to be a smarter monkey?

Many monkeys can in fact swing hammers harder and faster than humans.

It doesn’t really make them better at it though

Kids will often just repeat what they’ve heard to adults.

But the largest problems to these laws is the way they affected minority groups. If followed, the law would disproportionately affect disabled and queer teens who may suddenly be unable to access help and community.

I suspect there’s some selection bias in the kids you’re speaking to.

It’s exactly the way they said drug dealers would work

One step closer to the ferengi ideal.

Hey, sure. I’m not arguing for the term toxic masculinity. I’m arguing against pseudo masculinity because it’s way more confusing.

It’s probably better to find another term entirely

That may be. I’m just suggesting pseudo masculinity is worse because it’s already confused.

The people who are offended by “toxic masculinity” already use pseudo masculinity to describe everything not toxic masculinity.

All yold I think pseudo masculinity can only be more confusing.