

I’m ready to be wrong but isn’t that what the associated press is for?


I’m ready to be wrong but isn’t that what the associated press is for?


If it helps 27/28 is greater than 17/18.
The older you get the closer you are in age.


I feel like this describes me and I call myself demisexual, I’m only attracted to people who are attracted to me after years of pursuing people who hurt me for wanting them.


As far as I understand stackoverflow wants to be a wiki based on discussions. The consequences of this is whenever something feels duplicate it gets culled.
Stackoverflow can’t seem to distinguish new content from existing


This could be a extremely over engineered simulation for discovering medical procedures and cures… think about it if you can create a simulation where everything is happening some of those things could cause injuries or illness and some of those things get treated and some of those cases get better.
Personally I believe we are just the imagination of a large language model whose job it is to spit out medical advice to real people.


If by less stupid you mean more smart than I’d suggest the stack exchanges


At my stock brokerage we keep talking about how we can bring AI to our customers but we can’t do that without the compliance dude throwing a fit about “noooooooooooooo you can’t recommend trades to customers, ssstttoooooooooppppp then we become responsible for their decisions guuuyyyssss” (he doesn’t talk like that but it sounds like that to me)
I recently brought up the idea of using AI for trade support and giving it all sorts of tools to access internal assets and help customers fix their accounts or figure out what happened to their order, shit like that.
I work at a stock brokerage and I can confirm this is exactly the screen layouts these people have. By these people I’m talking about day traders I don’t actually know what this person is doing.
And yes they do look across all of those screens. I sat next to a guy who had six screens arranged in 3x2, the way he explained it he has all sorts of programs mostly in the domains of communication and news and he doesn’t even look at the other screens but when something moves it triggers his peripheral vision and he acts on it. Another day trader I know has nine screens in 3x3 but he only uses the bottom half of his screen real estate because he can’t read the top, he just likes having a big rectangular-like screen.
It’s all about peripheral vision to these kinds of professionals. They are 100% not looking at all of those screens, they just need to set up things to react to.
This guy is a meme though nobody is reacting to something happening right above your head.


Only reason why I’m so good at programming



be the change you wish to see in the fediverse


They’re kind of already is. It’s the free and open source community.
The problem is phones are actually incredibly impressive pieces of hardware and the fact that we can Mass produce them has diluted that opinion. I’m actually to look into building my own phone and I wanted to have at least some near-flagship specs. I know how to design my own circuit boards and get someone to print them. But acquiring CPUs that perform at least 1/4 as well as Pixels or iPhones is objectively not possible, these companies have deals with manufacturers for exclusive products. And even if you could these chips are so precise you will never be able to figure out the signaling yourself.
Maybe things have gotten better now that we have ai and you don’t need to be any sort of expert in anything you just need to be good enough at decision making problem solving and communicating to acquire the skills and knowledge to work on these chips. And by the time you’ve done all the work and acquired all the hardware you might have spent close to 3 to 5K on a device you could have just bought for $800. All for what, to circumvent privacy breaches that should be illegal in the first place?
And that’s the root problem we’re trying to solve. Another symptom of these companies being able to engage in the bad behavior that they do is that they gain the ability to overvalue themselves. There should be no safety or privacy concern when engaging in the purchase of any device for the same reason that people should not fear food poisoning every time they go to the grocery store.
That’s what the regulators are for. This is a legal issue not a technical one.
But the only underlying cause for why we’re not regulating tech companies is because fear of privacy violations is not reducing market activity. Apparently people are still going to use their phones even if their phones are listening to them having private conversations. Apparently people will still buy shit off of their phones even if their phones are going to use that data to show them ads.
Apparently the harm of your privacy being breached does not hurt enough to prevent you from doing good things.
Now if Android takes away my F-Droid, Tasker and Termux I’m gonna throw a fit. That’s not privacy that’s self-determination, I bought an Android because I can customize it to be as low friction for me as I need, if my phone starts giving me friction then we’re going to have problems.
I have been tinkering with this idea for a project file oriented version control software
I’m not sure if it’s in a state that I can share it yet but if you want to take a look I’m calling it duh.
I plan to eventually create an entire DuhHuh to serve as GitHub for everyone.