Communist

No I did not see that, link me to it? I can’t find it, a primary source please.

also i’m fairly certain such meat wouldn’t do anything? have you ever had animal meat? it would also have such chemicals and be mostly indistinguishable in terms of adrenaline content. You’d just digest it?

“Adrenochrome is mass produced and commercially available to the public, and is not a controlled substance.”

so you can just… get it without that?

Yo get mental health help, I didn’t have to check to know this is nonsense.

Edit: I had to check because come on this is too insane https://sd.vern.cc/fact-check/hillary-clinton-snuff-film/?__goaway_challenge=resource-load&__goaway_id=e86d8500f91b2d7477ab5ae610211f9a&__goaway_referer=https%3A%2F%2Fduckduckgo.com%2F

Edit2: I genuinely wish you luck on your mental health journey. I’m sorry you’re going through this

also adrenochrome can easily be made adrenaline is readily available I dunno why you’d get it this way??

The original definition of state is different from the western nuspeak one that means government

the point being that there will be government, just horizontally managed.

They are not adjusting their models at any cost to other benchmarks. Especially when the benchmark isn’t even public. This would be very easily caught.

no, they don’t have agi, but this benchmark isn’t proof of that either way, an ai that’s dumber than a human could still be agi

They get 85% on the last benchmark, this one was specifically designed to stump them, when the last one came out everyone said the same things as this go around.

will anyone be retracting their statements when they get to 85% on this one?

My point is that people should stop pointing this out or caring and that it’s not a real problem. As was my point in the original comment.

I don’t find the problem compelling enough to warrant a solution.

why should I care about this misunderstanding that can easily be remedied with even the most basic cursory research?

there are countless things we do this with, rivers don’t run, they flow

even with computers we have called processing “thinking” for ages and nobody ever cared

cities are actually not even capable of sleep either.

I think this is a problem that doesn’t matter at all even a little. Can you tell me why we should even try?

That doesn’t really work either, that adds synthesizing to the terminology but doesn’t describe most of the behaviors they have. It’s not reasoning or simulating either.

Give me a better solution? How do I talk about the behaviors it exhibits without anthropomorphizaton?

Yeah but saying all that is annoying so I think we should stick with saying thinking and everyone knowing what we mean isn’t literally identical to thought. Do you have a better solution?

Even if llm’s are a dead end, the amount of money going into creating AI dramatically pushes forward the date of its existence, we just emulated a fly brain, they’re doing a mouse next. This is a somewhat undeniable path to real intelligence, it will happen soon, even if the compute needed for a human brain turns out to be immense, the fly intelligence basically proved all you need is the connectome, so uh, yeah. If someone figures out how to automate the work that was done on the fly on a larger scale we’ll be there real quick.

I used something like it when I had a passive mixer so that I could work and use my personal pc.

don’t get a passive mixer though.

This would make sense if you were in a relationship for years… a hookup? nah man get the goddamn condom on

Bitcoin hits 120k

People who annoy you…

It is likely that your stomach is too acidic, that’s why they didn’t work on me. Eat it with something alkaline.

Nooooo! Not property damage noooooooooo!!!

We don’t have language for this and even if we did it would be needlessly complex, why bother

You have not said one thing i did not already know, none of it has to do with anything

an ai did something novel, this is an easily verified fact. The only alternative is that somebody else wrote the hypothesis.

He knows the basics, it’s just that they don’t lead to any of the conclusions he’s claiming they do. He also boldly assumes that everyone who disagrees with him doesn’t know anything. He’s a beast of confirmation bias.