Listen bro, you could have avoided this. You should have known that anytime you comment or vote on lemmy you could trigger a sensitive mod’s paranoia and be banned for that.
If you want to participate in Lemmy, you’re going to need to learn to read the room, figure out the single opinion that is being allowed, and stick to it.
It’s better than Reddit here bro, just make sure that you don’t stick out and you won’t be hammered down.
You posted one link. lmao, thinking I’m seeing red yet you start calling people nazi’s because you don’t know how to use a computer.
I haven’t said shit. You are a fucking nazi.
The pinnacle of intelligent discourse.
I think that you’ve lost the plot. That reply doesn’t even make sense in the context of this conversation.
Yes, I read the article that you linked and which is in the OP in which you believe that someone who drugs and rapes people is an ethical person acting legally.
Could you please fly to a different country, retake basic kindergarten to grade 12 education, and then rejoin this conversation once you’ve acquired the skills to make logical and informed arguments. Thanks.
It’s so clearly not a refusal. It is absolutely not illegal to offer alternatives to cancelling before cancelling. Is it annoying to have to send an extra email to finish cancelling? Mildly sure.
Yea I have zero issue with the fact that accounts with pictures of children’s genitals on them should be referred to the the authorities.
If people want privacy, host the pictures locally.
When you’re storing images with a cloud provider. They become responsible for the images that they store. If it’s a photo of a child’s genitals and that’s illegal for them to have those images on their servers and they need to protect themselves.
You’re not understanding what they are saying. They are not refusing to cancel the membership, they are just putting one more option in front of you before you cancel.
Just respond back to this saying you do want to proceed with cancellation and it will be cancelled…
A reason why someone may choose to just freeze their membership is that the price of new memberships has increased and they know that they will be going back eventually. It may actually be a better choice to freeze and keep your current rate if you plan to go back later and the different in price for a new membership is more than $10 a month more expensive.
Lol
“Do your own research”
Ok Karen sure. It’s up to me to prove other peoples random claims that they make on social media. Um no.
Lol yes I did notice.
“The wrong link”
“There’s one about a Swedish dude”
The gymnastics you’re going through to avoid actually facts is hilarious.
I am so confused. Did you read the article that you posted??? Are you just straight up defending pedophilia and rape?
The Toronto detective alleges that after the alerts were passed to the RCMP and then Toronto police, she looked at three of the images and found they depicted naked prepubescent girls. The images included an explicit sex act and exposed genitals.
depicted who I believe to be David Edward-Ooi Poon without a shirt, taking a selfie of himself while sticking out his tongue over an unconscious adult female," the search-warrant application states. The document goes on to describe the woman in the photo as naked below the waist and wearing a dark-coloured eye mask over her eyes. The detective alleges that that photograph and others she examined appeared to be stored in a folder on the iPhone titled “Girls I Drugged And Raped.”
The images included adult females with breasts and genitals exposed “who appeared to be unconscious,” the ITO says. “The body positioning of the females appeared to be limp and did not significantly change throughout the images taken.” Police allege they found other files on the iPhone that appeared to be “upskirt” images or photographs focusing on the buttocks of females, in folders with names suggesting they were underage girls.
Detectives laid 41 more charges in December including making and possessing child pornography, sexual assault, voyeurism for a sexual purpose and drugging someone to facilitate sexual assault.
Either you can’t read, or you are an incredibly disgusting person.
Great do you have a single example of what you’re claiming, lol. Google turning in a perfectly ethical person for doing something that should be legal and uncontroversial.
You’re moving the goal posts and changing your argument.
It’s because of the fact that violet makes all of violet’s posts about violet. Naturally people are going to want to know more about violet, but then violet responds that anyone who wants to know about violet is deranged.
They represent themselves as basically a typical woman as written by a male sci-fi author, and then they aggressive towards anyone who questions it. They make their content about themselves, but they act offended if anyone comments about them. It’s not the random commenters who are trying to make everything about the OP, they are just falling for the bait.
Look at me, I am woman, I have BOOBS, I like big sex and getting pounded, I am woman, I am an OBJECT. Not all women have personality. I am real woman with woman private parts. This is my entire persona. You don’t beleive me? You are fuuuuucked up.
Example please
It’s a Nazi term 🤣.
It’s a Latin word FFS
“Degenerate” originates from the Latin dēgenerātus, the past participle of dēgenerāre, meaning “to be inferior to one’s ancestors” or “to become unlike one’s race or kind”.
This game’s biggest flaw is its title.
What a dumbass article. It’s way too easy right now to burn a CD, we need another 25 years before were nostalgic about this one.
So Newt is calling for nuclear bombs to be detonated in Israel?
Yes, this is attention seeking behavior lol. You are making posts about yourself, about what you’re up to each day, about opinions that you imagine people have of you.
You have created this strawman argument that anyone questioning that you are who you are wants you to post nudes or something.
You know what you’re doing, lol, no need to be evasive about it.
This is the internet, we are all bots here. There is no such thing as identity.
It’s weird that someone replied to your post seeking attention about your identity? Only one of my sentences analyzed your behavior. The rest were a response to your post from the point of view of the average person.
Now it just seems like you’re absolutely trolling if you’re going to try to mock people who reply.
You can be who ever you want, I don’t believe you though.
I don’t believe that anyone on the internet is who they say they are.
It’s not really bothering me, you can be you, or be the character you’re playing or whatever, it’s all good.
If you want to be believed though, you would need to prove it in some way. And no I don’t mean by posting nudes or lewd content, it’s an easy enough thing to provide evidence for in a sfw way that protects your privacy.
Again, it’s not important that you prove it, but you won’t be believed until you do. Your posts are changing from being funny memes to being semi aggressive taunts about your identity. It seems like for you the question of your identity is a game for you and something that you’re using for attention. You can have whatever identity you want to have, but maybe try to stick to being funny and interesting and not whatever this new dynamic is.
Proof that giants are real