NoiseColor

I don’t think it’s a valid fallacy since there would be a whole different set of issues if to many millionaire immigrants came to America and not learn the “culture”.

More context please.

He is the kind that slowly becomes more and more conservative and less and less funny and then cries about how he got cancelled on a talk show.

Oh, but he would be. He is that kind of guy.

Where can I get the crypto?

That’s a funny comment. Did I say they do?

Most gamers enjoy different genres in all kinds of styles.

Some games have realistic graphics, some have stylized graphics, some have no graphics at all.

You can call them art or fart, the fact is realistic graphics are becoming better with the help of ai. The technology makes them better. Even the technology you don’t like make them better.

From personal experience I can say that I found no hate in the product, no ads, no fraud and unfortunately I haven’t found any crypto there…

You have no idea what your are taking about.

It’s a really good package. Brave has great UX. I like the concept of Firefox, but when I want to use a browser, brave offers the best and the most robust experience.

I know it’s hated around lemmy, but I also know a lot of it is not based. I try alternatives every now and then, but the usage is just sub par. Just tried Firefox for a month. Had too many issues. Brave works.

That’s like saying that no ai image can be realistic, because it was ai generated.

Yeah, but you know what will happen, all of a sudden the games will become amazing and everybody will want to play. All of them 😁

Not art, realism.

Ai hate is so strong!

I think it looks extremely promising. It may be a bit uncanny with the faces, probably fixable, but environments are dope!

This is fantastic, this is probably the way to get completely realistic graphics. This is the way, this is finally actual progress in realism.

Maybe it’s a Christmas version

No. I mean you can get all philosophical and say that everything has value only because that’s a human concept, but thats not really something I would answer to.

Fiat has value because it’s enforced. Because we have institutions that enforce it and because all of our lives are intertwined with it. We buy food with it and we are paid with it. It’s everywhere. It doesn’t make it immune to manipulation and fraud and crime, but we can take legal action because law is also intertwined with the same system.

Crypto is , with a couple of exceptions, a really terrible casino.

Yes.

I think it’s an exaggeration of its crime utility. Normal money is king for crime.

I think most people don’t understand cryptocurrencies. On one side it’s all hyperbolic about being your own bank and financial freedom and new tech, on the other side it’s hyperbolic about how there is no underlying value, it’s all going to 0, scams, drugs, terrorism, money laundering,…

But the fact is that crypto does have an underlying value. It’s gambling. Gambling is a huge industry.

I have a similar situation at work. But I’m a designer. Previously I have worked for a company that did research in ai, from a product standpoint where I also had a boss who thought ai can do anything and blamed the workers for not succeeding. Now Im beginning to see the same thing here in my new company. The boss, product manager and a few of the developers (actually those with less ai experience) are driving this motion that ai will just replace everything. I tried to tell them about my experience, but they didn’t listen to a designer.

Now this pressure is also coming to the UX team. A few days ago the boss asked me to use ai to reskin a whole app. It was assumed by him that that’s a simple thing. Why is it so hard for them to understand it doesn’t work like that?