oh I’m just using their comment as a sounding board for frustration. nothing will make this kind of troll stop except a ban.

engaging, not engaging, neither matters.

god damn we need moderation. has anyone tried to get ahold of the sole moderator so we can get this idiot banned?

the irony of this being a conversation about a JagoDibuja comic is pretty glaring, honestly. i do love it.

quite entertaining!

porque no los dos?

edit: you guys, you should probably know who the artist is before you defend him. this guy has been drawing women as sex objects for years.

surely you understand there’s a difference from “I disagree its fine.”

and “lol nobody cares loser. fuck off.”

i really hope so cause I’m getting close to following the OP and leaving this weird stuff behind, honestly. i come here for cute animals and art, not this. 😭

“hey this place isnt what I thought it was. I’m sad to leave” is not a toxic mindset.

this whole thread is just bullying in a community that is meant to be a balm from that.

the fact that you’re getting downvotes is especially depressing. considering this is a place a lot of us come to get away from those kind of obnoxious titles and whatnot.

i have seen “positive” communities turn toxic for the strangest of reasons. and I think this is a bit close to that for my liking. 😥

i don’t understand it either it stopped being fun almost immediately.

and there was never an AI post. the original person that made the trend just made that up.

I’m kind of getting sick of reading all the LLM and AI crap. i just come here for cute things 😢

all tuckered out 😴

not loving this title trend.

what posts here are ai gen? i haven’t seen any recently.

aren’t they the same system? just different regions of release.

the headline is scary, but the article is scarier, honestly.

“I learned about the incident from Chakrabarty, a computer-science professor at Stony Brook University. I’d previously written about his efforts to quantify the proliferation of AI in novels self-published on Amazon. After commenting on Tuch’s post, he plugged the whole column into the Pangram AI detector. The program estimated that more than 60 percent of it was AI-generated. I ran the column through four other AI-detection tools: Two of them flagged 30 percent of the work as likely AI-generated, one found no AI, and one suspected AI but offered no percentage.”

i think 30% is almost scarier than the 60 or the potential of a 100% article. that someone would rely on it and disperse it into their own work means more people get used to reading it and it being a part of their every day routine.

unknowingly consuming partial slop sucks.

some AI slop is quite beautiful compared to some terrible non-AI tattoos i’ve seen, honestly.

edit: apparently the downvoters haven’t seen that famous image of the guy who made a cat’s asshole from his bellybutton. 🤷‍♀️

calls for vandalism of personal property. not good.

you made an offhand joke and got mad at him for continuing the joke?

they’re pretty damned evil, dude. “but other companies are worse” doesn’t take away from their shittiness.

that was such a great read no joke. I love it when people use spite as a motivator.