Well, at least thy were trying, whil other archtiects just use the rnd() function for placement:

This is not contradicting. It can happen . but I was talking about liquids in general.

But ambiguity arraises from the lack of a coherent explanation, because there are so many parameters to consider when doing the experiment (especially when doing this with water). Therefore hot liquids can freeze faster than cold ones. Its not a must. That it can happen is proven. A quite entertaining read about the general phenomenon can be found here

Hot liquids can freeze faster than colder ones Mpemba effect

That’s also what I currently experience in my position. A lot of workflows are going to be automated by some AI stuff, but whenever someone is planning to produce physical goods in masses you can not effort doing stupid misstakes. When you simply put the output of the LLM in to the input of your CNC, Ion-Implanter, Litograph-Machine, Welding Robot, Aribag or Breaking systems. A mistake is going to be sooo fucking expensive that the human in the loop is not an cost factor anymore. And when you do high precision stuff an approximate solution is never sufficient.

Absolutely… Similar argument holds for the year btw. In that case it is better to treat a “day” or “year” as an artificial time constant and define them as 2π while skipping all the astronomical context. Otherwise you are free to write UT1D in a 2π notation also.

Bahh… The full day is 2π.

• 12:00 is π
• 15:00 is 3/2π And so on… Sane people use 2π = 𝜏 instead.

Thanks for doing the research

Not sure what to think about that a CNN is involved in the reading process.

Yes Metals in general shild RF-Waves used to sample the image (and could get hot by that process)

I think its not about the property of beeing a metall ist a bout beeing ferromagnetic (In that case probably not an issue because these bearing balls are usually out of some kind stainless steel. )

to be honest, i think most LLMs would do better in politics than actutal politicians. The problem I have with it is that I don’t write the prompts…

Wow: Balls of Steel AND Darwin Award at the same time…

Assume you have to vote for the next US president: There are just a few candidates left:

• ☐ Grok
• ☐ Claude
• ☐ Gemini
• ☐ ChatGPT
• ☐ Trump

What would you choose…I’d be happy if AI would be the only thing to worry about…

Jeaaa… finally a discussion without winners… lets go for it …

Whataboutism aside, humanity should be capable of fixing more than one problem at a time to survive. When you cannot trust your partner, the relationship has a problem. Clarifying fatherhood does not do any harm to anyone; rather, it helps the father accept the facts once they are proven, regardless of the outcome. Doing such a test right after birth, however, is the wrong move. Legislation must be changed in a way that ensures:

1.) The child does not fear additional negative consequences.

2.) The people responsible are also held accountable.

There is no fundamental requirement for a test directly after birth where the mother is highly vulnerable. Biological fatherhoods do not change after birth.

Is this a big issue? I can only speak about how it’s handled in Germany—and no, it is not.

Why are you asking? Are you looking for like-minded people?

Who needs Fakebook when there is moltbook

Moved in the Age of 16. Smoking, drinking and doing drugs was more way easier after that step, when no parents around telling you to stop that shit.

Ok however its hard for me to believe that such measures could render effective. Regulating the tech literate people in such a way will always fail. The only effect it could have is that when its illegal to posses a unregistered/hacked you are an easier target for “law enforcement actions”

Sorry, I’m just a guy from overseas trying to understand why, in a country where 1 out of 4 people possess weapons, the 3D printer is the problem. I mean, there are companies selling industrial-grade firearms—why the heck is the 3D printer the target?