I had a strange experience at the swimming pool today.
When I walked into the women’s locker room, I saw two female staff trying to unclog a drain using some tools and guidance from AI. My first thought was that maybe management was trying to save costs by having staff handle everything themselves.
But then I paused and realized that might have been a bit narrow-minded.
I suddenly remembered something from last year — at the exact same place, a male plumber had to come into the women’s locker room to fix a similar problem. I remember feeling uncomfortable at the time, especially since there was no prior notice.
That’s when my perspective shifted.
Sometimes “AI + do-it-all staff” isn’t really about efficiency — it’s about working within real-world constraints. In some situations, there simply aren’t better options.
That said… after I finished swimming, the drain was still clogged.
AI is powerful, but in the end, some problems still need experienced hands to solve.


AI code generation has single handedly increased security vulnerabilities by 52%, and Critical vulnerabilities by about 400%, and it’s only getting worse as the adoption rate increases. LINK TO SOURCE
You personally will be negatively impacted in your lifetime by a security vulnerability caused by AI, it might be security footage of you in a store or it could be your name, address, phone, and government id number, and medical data from a clinic.
Yeah but not in my code
Also this is a sales link