I had a strange experience at the swimming pool today.

When I walked into the women’s locker room, I saw two female staff trying to unclog a drain using some tools and guidance from AI. My first thought was that maybe management was trying to save costs by having staff handle everything themselves.

But then I paused and realized that might have been a bit narrow-minded.

I suddenly remembered something from last year — at the exact same place, a male plumber had to come into the women’s locker room to fix a similar problem. I remember feeling uncomfortable at the time, especially since there was no prior notice.

That’s when my perspective shifted.

Sometimes “AI + do-it-all staff” isn’t really about efficiency — it’s about working within real-world constraints. In some situations, there simply aren’t better options.

That said… after I finished swimming, the drain was still clogged.

AI is powerful, but in the end, some problems still need experienced hands to solve.

  • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    29 days ago

    AI code generation has single handedly increased security vulnerabilities by 52%, and Critical vulnerabilities by about 400%, and it’s only getting worse as the adoption rate increases. LINK TO SOURCE

    You personally will be negatively impacted in your lifetime by a security vulnerability caused by AI, it might be security footage of you in a store or it could be your name, address, phone, and government id number, and medical data from a clinic.