• Brosplosion@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 hours ago

    One potential cause is that the Rocky Mountains are maybe newer than oil formation in the region? They are a pretty recent addition (around 50-80mya)

  • LostListener@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I don’t know anything on the topic but I have read before about seismic lines. Theres a bunch of straight lines cut through forests that are visible on google maps, and they’re apparently related to oil/gas surveying. Maybe this type of surveying requires a flatter land. Or like others said maybe theres just too much rock for oil anyway, idk.

    https://cusjc.ca/mrp/fracturedforests/

  • iilwl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    I’m not a geologist so I can’t give an answer I’d like, but I do enjoy reading about such things. Your question prompted me to search on my own about it. You should read about the formation of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin and of course, the formation of the rockies and geologic timelines and forces involved. Wish I could actually provide a short and concise answer, but I just like to think about it and am by no means a scholar. Good luck!

    Bonus edit:

  • klankin@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I only know about this from fish YouTube so I could be wrong, but that looks like the border to the western interior seaway, a very habitable, shallow sea in north america. I think it would result in an insane algea bloom, some millions of years ago, then seal it in with seabed sediment before drying up.

  • AnarchoEngineer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Unless those mountains were under water or covered in a tropical area a very long time ago, they likely wouldn’t have any oil in them because there’d be dead life forms in the sediment to get turned into oil.

    Utah (the dark patch seen on your map below Idaho) has both the rocky mountains and oil because 50million years ago it was covered by lake uinta.

  • Canadian_Cabinet @lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I’m not knowledgeable on the subject at all, but Wikipedia says most crude oil is composed of decayed plankton and algae. I’m guessing the mountains were never completely underwater, therefore no plankton. But its also probably too hard to expensive to drill there as well

  • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    too difficult to drill through the mountains?

    Well, it’s difficult. So why would you do it.

  • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Too difficult to drill that far when it’s closer to the surface.

    But maybe it’s also because mountains are effectively tall barriers.