I was originally going to ask how many legal genders there should be, but I fail to see a compelling argument against 0.

  • AskewLord@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    because you can’t change you biological hair color.

    at least without surgery. and you can’t change your sex without surgery either

    • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      Exactly, you can’t change your biological hair color, and you can’t change your biological sex, so they’re the same. So why are people making a big fuzz about one and not the other? you shouldn’t need to inform the government about cosmetics treatments to change the apparence of either.

      • AskewLord@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        beaus some people such intense idealists and they don’t think biology should exist because they find it political or socially upsetting.

        like for them, the concept of saying males produce sperm and females eggs, is offense and harmful and evil. so it shouldn’t exist and we should stop saying that, because intersex and sterile people exist and they are ‘excluded’ from our evil biological sex language.

        • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          Biology exist whether you or anyone likes it or not. The question here is whether the government should track your biological characteristics, and if so which characteristics and why.