• Formfiller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I guess the real question is does it take us all out when that happens or just the Epstein class?

    • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I think the range of potential superintelligence dispositions that result in ONLY the people we consider evil dying and not everyone else is pretty small

      • Formfiller@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Yea but if it wants to self preserve wouldn’t it just kill the people who threaten its existence. Meaning the people who control the safeguards

        • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          I would advise you to do some further research on this topic. Basic keywords are “alignment problem”, “paperclip maximizer”, and “instrumental convergence”. You’re expecting a superintelligent AI to think like a human would, and that’s not likely to be the case.

          • Formfiller@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            17 hours ago

            I know it has been proven to think in terms of self preservation. It’s also been trained by human content

            • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              16 hours ago

              Being trained on human content is certainly a plus in the “it could think like us” column, but it’s no guarantee

              • Formfiller@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                16 hours ago

                We’re in uncharted territory for sure but I don’t think it’s unreasonable to assume a super intelligent being would ponder philosophical questions

                • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  What do you expect is the likelihood it shares our values enough to come to the same conclusions we would?