Many countries include ‘Democratic’ or ‘People’s’ in their names, even though they are not democratic and do not serve their people. Examples: Democratic People’s Republic of Korea Lao People’s Democratic Republic People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria Democratic Republic of the Congo And German Democratic Republic (East Side) in 1949–1990. None of these states are democratic, power and wealth are concentrated in the hands of a small ruling elite. Who are they fooling with these names?

      • bedwyr@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        The Iroquois had a league of sorts that could arguably be considered a uniting of states, stone age though the tribes may have been.

    • Walking Antithesis@mastodon.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      if you stick strictly to the name “united states” then yes, it’s the first entity to name themselves this. later entities include the united states of belgium but they appear later (1790).

      however, the netherlands used the name “united provinces” and “(republic of the seven) united netherlands” from 1588, sooooo I guess it can count if you make your question broad?

      • hirihit640@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I wonder if the US founders knew about the Netherlands and thus tacked on “Of America”…somehow I doubt it

    • humanamerican@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I suppose it was. Good point.

      Come to think of it, what bothers me isn’t our name so much as the attitude of so many of my fellow citizens that the rest of the world is of no consequence. Our name puts a fine point on that narrow world view, regardless of whether it was intended that way.

      So yeah, I’d rather see the culture change than the name.