• sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    A lot of weird things in this comment, like implying that it is OK to use llms to search for surface information. That is just as biased as searching for more complicated info, and the tone of the llm response white-washes it all away.

    • cley_faye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t know where you think I implied it was ok for surface search, but it’s the exact opposite of what I wanted to say.

      • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        There’s a large list of things LLM are known to not be reliable for: searching anything beyond surface informations

        This implies that it is reliable for “surface informations” which i disagree with, though a lot of people get sucked in that way