Automod bugged out and banned me forever from reddit, i want to explore more Lemmy now but am not sure if Im missing anything good im not directly looking for–i am also kinda autistic and oblivious so if there are instances with a bad history or full of chuds or something a heads up would be swell

  • SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    They also spend a lot of time moderating and keep asking for money to develop lemmy so they don’t have to work.

    Between that and funding .ml is why I switched to piefed and donate to them.

    • Carl@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Piefed is problematic in its own ways, just FYI. I don’t know what it is about fediverse devs and trying to insert themselves as supermods, but the two seem to be strongly correlated.

      • manxu@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        How is Piefed problematic? Honestly asking - the only “controversy” I’ve witnessed was about the list of default instances.

        • PlzGibHugs@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          I know Rimu has some really weird opinions about how a social media network should be designed, such as believing that the 90-9-1 rule should be prevented and being against memes, and tends to be overly pushy about implementing these “”“features”“”. That said, so far as I’m aware, its not so much problematic as just stupid design decisions.

          • OpenStars@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Adding to this: a lot of the most heinous, truly “problematic” stuff ended up being demonstrably false accusations - like a feature may be opt-in, or at worst opt-out, but either of those is a far cry from being hard-coded as was claimed.

            That said, the software truly is “opinionated”, pushing its own agenda even if you can opt-out of most of it - an instance admin still has to be wary of each new feature added, especially with the lack of transparency surrounding the announcements.

            Although personally I think Lemmy is equally opinionated, just more in the sense of what features it decides not to implement at all.

            Both platforms have their advantages, and it seems more important for an end-user to pick a good admin team that reflects their values more than picking a platform, especially if using a 3rd-party app than replaces the UI anyway. (Though secondary to that, I do think PieFed has the strongest edge, especially right now before the release of Lemmy 1.0.)

    • OpenStars@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s too bad they won’t allow funding to go towards development of just the software itself, separately from the moderation and other costs of maintaining Lemmy.ml. As it is, Lemmy is a tankie platform first and foremost, and only secondarily offered for use by the rest of the world. You can see this in the development philosophy even: like even Reddit offers a modmail, notification upon moderation events, and ability to see deleted posts (PieFed offers some of this too), though Lemmy offers strong rights to instance admins, and somewhat lessened ones for moderators, but significantly weaker privileges to mere users (who I guess they feel don’t deserve to be told upon e.g. being banned from an instance, and instead merely have to find out the hard way?).