The wild thing is, NFTs were creating value before they were called that, and they still are. A git commit hash is an NFT, for all intents and purposes. The only uhh innovation is being able to pay money for it.

“I like it in here.”

Lower temperature is not necessarily better quality. At 0 it will get very repetitive, it’s for classification tasks, not for prose.

I suppose the optimal temperature depends on the model and the task, and I don’t think it’s very sensitive. Varying temp might even give better results, who knows.

By being just a little weird, but in a pattern, and not to you. A pattern like: every n tokens raise the temperature (randomness) for one token. Then to dectect AI, you tokenize and calculate how expected each next token is. Then you try fitting the pattern to that.

Is it webscrapers?

Not how language works. This artist just had a strip mocking prescriptive linguists too.

deleted by creator

Supposedly the people paid to rate responses are already using AI

LLM is fine to say, not more awkward than element. And it is AI.

And I wish we’d call phones computers. It’s been very profitable for corps for people to not realize that they are.

Don’t forget the AI bubble is also a ram and SSD bubble.

Not in a “Darwinian moment”, like the CEO says. Then healthy social structures can be decisive.

Survival of the fittest is about species, not individuals. He’s saying AI is a threat to the human race.

Except it is a fairly good artifice of grass.

Good for what? Looking at? It’s not gonna satisfy a goat.

We only care for the look (“the output”), and we don’t expect more of it, or sell it for more than it is. That’s why it’s not a controversial term for astroturf. It wasn’t controversial for AI either until very recently. In 60 years of AI nobody has split hairs over output of intelligence. It’s justified but weirdly misdirected anger.

AI is a perfectly cromulent word for the thing.

Do you question the grass part of artificial grass? It’s obviously not grass.

Imho nothing wrong with AI use by professionals, as long as it’s verified. That obviously wasn’t the case.

BBQ your own scrolls

All AI is actual AI. It doesn’t need to be real intelligence to be artificial, should be obvious. Are you telling me artificial grass shouldn’t be called that because a goat can’t eat it?

Inference and training are separate in every ML architecture, what are you on about? And yes LLMs are ML, by definition, no need to argue.

Nah, this story has been developing since before the LLM boom. “AI” has never been rare in science headlines like this.

Our company decided to build our own ai translation system because the human translators we’ve been hiring started using AI… Quality dropped immensely, trust is lost. CEOs don’t feel like shopping around. So sad.