Any business that has over 4% market rate should be forcibly split.
Steam is not FORCED to compete and innovate or go under, they do that at the whim of the owner. Who can change his mind. Or die, and the company will be inherited by whomever and sloppify.
Heck, anyone shilling that Steam is a good guy - ffs, you do not own the games you bought.
(Why 4%? There are some old studies that at 5% it brings more profit to get rid of the competition, below innovations are the way to get the money).
As a foreigner whose native tongue has gendered nouns and adjectives: we default to sir to sir-presenting people, ma’am to ma’am presenting, and "sir? ma’am? " when unsure and clarification is needed.
I do not understand why you’d want to preemptively force gender someone by choosing a neutral/or newspeak/ form of address - to me it seems much much much worse than defaulting to asking for preference (“sir? ma’am?” option is the best - it declares you’ve noticed the interlocutor is a nb and passes the ball to them).
If you’re looking for 1 word that would always work, I recommend embracing your inner old British Lady and calling everyone pet (petal), dear or love. :-)
He personally guarantees 40 billion from 111 bilion for the Paramount - Warner Bros acquisition.
I do wonder if this might put the financing there at risk lol.
Boy you’re in for a ride.
Palantir runs on Oracle Cloud.
Oracle finances Paramount buying out Warner Bros.
Other shady shit Oracle does: https://thedreydossier.substack.com/p/the-merger-that-needed-a-war
Basically think Oracle is a competent League of Evil that can hide from the media spotlight.
Any parental rights hearing, education, and right to not be conscripted in case of war.
(At least in Europe)
Literally! They were told to return to office to achieve higher productivity (it was circling the news around September?)
male victims were provoking, i.e. asking for it.
What the heck is wrong with you?
Edit: oops, my bad, I forgot we’re in the Shitpost community.
But they do commit ~50% of spouse murders, so at least thet have that for them?
Oh, and the women are vastly underrepresented in the victim statistics.
Interestingly, some researchers when they control for provocation, do find that the difference is because of gender norms, and without them the violence rates equalize - see https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2F0033-2909.119.3.422
Another fun fact, when it comes to incarceration rates women do tend to get more lenient sentences because they are women (and act pitiful on the trail) - however it is slowly changing as more and more judges slowly learn to ignore that bullcrap.
Sources and initial readings can be found in this wikipedia article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_differences_in_crime
It is fun :)
Can be caused my dude.
People who have experienced more hardship
Doesn’t match the data. Study and raw data say nothing about the hardships.
Reading comprehension my dude. I wrote A or B, study says A or B.
This is a metastudy not an original study though?
(And this is a shitpost community)
A sentence later it says
These authors posited that mental disorders may lead to the adoption of a meat-less diet. The authors stated that individuals with mental disorders may “choose a vegetarian diet as a form of safety or self-protective behavior”
And I wrote
or crazy people are more often on vegan diet, dealer’s choice
Not only that, but also vegan diet is literally making people crazy (or crazy people are more often on vegan diet, dealer’s choice).
Source: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10408398.2020.1741505#abstract
The majority of studies, and especially the higher quality studies, showed that those who avoided meat consumption had significantly higher rates or risk of depression, anxiety, and/or self-harm behaviors. There was mixed evidence for temporal relations, but study designs and a lack of rigor precluded inferences of causal relations. Our study does not support meat avoidance as a strategy to benefit psychological health.
It literally isn’t. Google shareholder primacy and you’ll notice its a norm, not a law (in the USA).
You can also Google Midjourney.
You do realise that prompts to and responses from the LLM are not as simple as what you wrote “1+1=?”. The context window is growing for a reason. And LLMs dont have two dimensional probability of the next token?
My dude. At over 4% market share companies are incentivised to buy out competition and become monopolies because it’s more profitable.
Yes. Perfect. Because any and all global companies so far are evil and anti-consumer. Disagree? Name 3.
So yeah, I’m glad we agree, that any company at 4% market share must be stopped from growing, because otherwise all of that happens.