Your perspective is at least as good as mine, I never smoked.

Well, you started smoking at some point for some reason. Either social pressure or you liked it.

Not calling you stupid, or saying that you are entirely wrong, but maybe consider that another smoker is at a different spot than you, right now. We humans like to repeat the mistakes of others.

I want to congratulate you for stopping!

Don’t get me wrong… but I hope college level is better than that.

I recently heard a story of a horse slowly starving on a grass field, because the owner insisted that the horse was fine on the field and apparently animal services were fine with it???

Anyway, I am not sure if a grass field can provide enough food for a horse long term.

Doesn’t anyone know more? I just have a story.

Well he isn’t… he just kinda dismisses gender if i understood him right… like he listened and choose this.

It means that he believes a sentient human can not transition by their own choice but he gets transition a sentient AI as he wishes.

And honestly, I think that highlights the issue if transition means he gets to have a woman submit to his every word, he supports it. So any transwoman who are into old white men and fulltime submission kink? There is an opportunity!

Always remember, he believes that trans people can’t transition as they can’t change their biological sex.

But he calls an ai without biological sex and with a male coded name, the female version of that name. So trans people can’t change their gender because of biological sex buz he can change the gender of an ai.

It is clearly not a hijab.

Yeah. Same.

Fair enough while I have opinions.

But it makes me wonder if OP actually used idle for very lazy or if they never actually read their own post.

Very lazy = idle?

No? Or is my english bad?

Also they sold your data to the next broker.

Weird example but ok.

And no, it is not only historical. I stated that in my original comment and I invite you to look at left wing politics but some “left wing” politician’s position on some random issue, but a widely supported position by the left wing community. You will see that they are all in opposition of hierarchy.

But let’s take your weirdly racist example, where is the hierarchy?

That is nonsense.

The left was coined by its opposition to the monarchy while the right supported it.

So left has been currently and historically speaking in opposition of hierarchies and in favor of equality.

The right consequently has been in favor of hierarchies.

I think all of these actions are morally wrong but could you tell me how they are objective and not subjective? A reasonable person seems to be a person and consequently fundamentally subjective.

In my mind, I acknowledge that i only ever wanted to have sex with women. But i would be an idiot to make being straight part of my identity because if I would ever meet a man that I could and would love, I would just have made it more difficult for me to accept that and there is zero gain in identifying as straight. I don’t think we need to identify our sexuality, we just need to be willing to accept ourselves and go with the flow.

Saying “I am 100% straight!” Seems to be a good way to have an identity crisis when you find someone attractive that doesn’t make you feel straight enough to accept it.

It is bullying but nazis deserve it. But as with most things, it isn’t that simple.

Let’s say l, we bully the nazi by poking fun at the ridiculously stupid bases of their beliefs. everyone who feels attacked by that, is a fucking nazi, and why would we care for their feelings? Fuck them.

Let’s say, we bully the nazi by poking fun at his physical appearance. Is everyone with a similar physical appearance a fucking nazi? No! Is it reasonable that they see it as body shaming? Yes. So yes, you bully a nazi, good job! But you also body shame others. And those others might understand that you bully a nazi, and are supportive, but nonetheless, you tell them that their appearance is something bad.

I mean, let’s say, i wanna bully candace owens for being a nazi. She is an anti-semit, she is far-right, she made comments that imply that the Holocaust within germany was fine but hilter made the “mistake” to “globalize” it. She supported kayne West with his… comments… I think we can call her a nazi. So i should be fine bullying her! But if i would bully her for being black, or with black stereotypes, you would probably tell me to stop being racist and you would be right. But if I would mock her for her beliefs that Brigitte macron wants to assassinate candace, you wouldn’t care and would laugh with me.

You might be fine with nazis being killed, but if whoever kills them, also kills 1 non-nazi as causality per nazi killed, you might don’t support that. And if you do, maybe 1000 non-nazi causalities would bother you.

I don’t think highly of those misogyny groups that call themselves mra. But honestly, I have heard them complain about all these things.

But hey, sexist, who calling other sexist sexist, are still sexist and can fuck off.

Past tense. You can’t change the past. Checkmate!

I will change it to “tagged a person who ate raw pasta until they vomited” then we don’t need to update each other :)